Javatards more than welcome
C# / .NET Thread
Tyler Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
Ian Jackson
based
Henry Diaz
Owen Foster
Sorry I can't read this as I don't know any letters past C
Adrian Perry
ok so basically im just not gonna use c# haha sorry not sorry
Blake Hill
based and keeping-the-ecosystem-pure-pilled
Aaron Morgan
Why does this language make Any Forums seethe so much?
Nathan Edwards
because it's the language of devs who are actually employed and have families
Ryan Sanders
$ csc
Microsoft (R) Visual C# Compiler version 3.6.0-4.20224.5 (ec77c100)
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
warning CS2008: No source files specified.
error CS1562: Outputs without source must have the /out option specified
Connor Roberts
Pure jealousy at stable, comfy, employment
Jose Walker
What stable and comfy job are you doing, user?
Anthony Taylor
Lead dev (so I delegate anything I don't want to do), work remote permanently, 6 fig salary, set my own hours, unlimited PTO, equity, great benefits, etc.
What more could you want?
Colton Smith
Source: gitlab.com
The benchmarking test methodology is flawed for JIT-compiled languages. The C# code needs to run a few thousand times before the JITter kicks in, notices it's on a hot path and optimizes it. A proper benchmarking test would first run the code in a warmup stage to give the JITter a chance to optimize it before doing a proper run.
The way BitArray is used might also not good for performance because the JITter might not be able to eliminate the bounds checks.
Henry Nelson
I’m going to look into that this week.
Jordan Baker
So closed the entire source is on GitHub
Carson Wilson
I ran a different algorithm that doesn’t use a massive bit field and it smoked it
Ian Richardson
There's also the possibility of using .NET Native AoT instead. It is still experimental, though.
Elijah Murphy
I work with .Net at my job, it's comfy as fuck.
Jackson Ramirez
It's literally just M$ branded Java with many of the same flaws from a PLT standpoint. If you want a cleaner Java, ok, but why? Even F# is just a worse OCaml.
Connor Allen
>Even F# is just a worse OCaml.
Here_we_go.jpg
Jaxon Butler
Isn't it the best?
Benjamin Ortiz
>If you want a cleaner Java, ok, but why?
Actual runtime generics
Actual value types
A good standard library (LINQ, threading/synchronization primitives, binary buffers, etc.)
ASP.NET and Entity Framework
I will say that Kotlin looks nice though, it's just a shame it's attached to the JVM
Bentley Robinson
It's enjoyable to work with, I can't complain. Tooling is nice too. It's also very polyvalent and I like being able to make the whole wpf/xamarin/aspcore on the same codebase.
There are things that could be better (like having wpf run on linux, though I think it's on its way with MAUI), but it's complete and nice to work with.
Jonathan Turner
Ok guy
Nicholas Cooper
Don’t hold your breath on Maui for linux
Jonathan Torres
Yeah, that would be cool though.
Christopher Taylor
>I think it's on its way with MAUI
It's not. That's only for phones, macOS and Windows. Officially there is no Linux support, but there are community projects.
Cooper Ortiz
Baste