>An analysis of pull requests, or users’ submissions of new code to the projects of other software developers, revealed that code written by women was accepted 78.6 percent of the time. For men, the figure was 74.6 percent. But when female coders did indicate their gender, they were far less likely to have their code accepted, with their approval rate plummeting to 62.5 percent
how do I find more female coders to hire? Men are not very good at coding.
Yes Transformer(autists) are generally better programmers
Brandon Wright
>cd code >cd.. >cd..
Easton Brooks
Men prove that they are better at everything, including being professional women. They push women out of the workforce and back into their traditional roles. My god, the Bogdanov plan finally makes sense!
Joseph Torres
>pony mare icon >anime girl icon >furry girl icon the retarded researchers probably used this as an indicator of a female. This is why nobody trusts psychologists' results.
Anthony Rivera
It's truly beautiful that women are now supporting this move to destroy everything they have built over decades. And the one's that are slightly awake to notice the bullshit are called terfs and cancelled, like Rowling. Incredible.
Sebastian Allen
It will still be used as evidence. Are you looking forward for the git gender equality movement? Womens code must be equally accepted as mens code. If you don't accept the code you are a sexist.
Connor Phillips
Anyone got that screencap of the girl who committed like 300 times to some open source project on linux, but it was actually just changing variables to const values?
Gavin Gutierrez
>when indicate gender am i seriously expected to believe that code maintainers bother to look at someones profile and if they do they reject specifically because of the woman/whatever lgby tag. plummer to 60 odd lol. plummet. fuck off.
Jordan Young
Deeply wrong paper.
Nicholas Howard
>we guessed the gender of a bunch of people on github and found a 4% difference in PR acceptance rates between the two groups >this means females are more competent >it definitely does not mean that females are more likely to make useless but uncontroversial documentation typo fixes
Isaiah Rogers
It's about control user. It's just another tool to make sure the repo doesn't compete with anything made by corporate. I can just picture it now >open source os made by a bunch of people >someone commits some shit code, is rejected >person makes a stink about the devs being sexist >repo is closed by github >microsoft wins again
Jacob Ortiz
/thread
Asher Gonzalez
const
Thomas Ramirez
>useless but uncontroversial documentation typo fixes OOOPEN SOOORC COOODER here. this is very true 1000%
Landon Collins
This was unironically their methodology.
Woketards in academia are willing to push the absolute dumbest fucking shit through peer review these days if the results agrees with their confirmation bias of diversity/equity/inclusion.