/pcbg/ - PC Building General

>UPGRADE & BUILD ADVICE
Post build list or current specs including MONITOR: pcpartpicker.com/
Provide specific use cases (e.g. 4K editing, high FPS gaming)
State budget and region

>NEWS
R7 5800X3D (2Q2022)
Intel Arc desktop GPU (2Q2022)

>RECOMMENDED CPUs
HTPC(4K60)/Web Browsing: i3 10105
Budget Gaming: i3 12100
Gaming: i5 12400
Multicore: i7 12700

>RECOMMENDED GPU PERFORMANCE LEVEL
Budget 1080p: Used RX 480/580 4GB
1080p: RX 6600
1440p: RTX 3060 Ti
2160p: RTX 3080

>RECOMMENDED RAM
2x 8GB DDR4 3200/3600 CL16

>RECOMMENDED COOLERS
linustechtips.com/topic/891730-cpu-cooler-performance-tier-list/

>RECOMMENDED PSUs
Gaming: 500-850W depending on GPU (aim for 50-75% at load)
cultists.network/140/psu-tier-list/

>RECOMMENDED SSDs
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade (PCIe Gen4)
Budget: WD SN750 SE
ssd.borecraft.com/

>MOTHERBOARD INFO:
AM4 B550/X570 - CPU-less BIOS flash feature advisable if pairing with Zen 3
overclock.net/threads/vrm-on-the-new-am4-motherboards.1624051/
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yPS3hj_K7EPT4RBWCyjdKNP56pnwDz-IgBc0975-FUg

>RECOMMENDED MONITORS
pcpartpicker.com/user/pcbg/saved/#view=RzdbjX

Previous:

Attached: ezgif-6-bf7e21bf3b.gif (1279x720, 2.06M)

what is the current best nvme to get for speed and price? i see that the samsung 970 is the most popular in online stores, but it released in 2018 so there has to be something better by now

Which is a better way to spend your money? Upgrading your RAM from 16 to 32 gig or buying faster 16 gig RAM?

Depending if you're constantly hitting the ceiling of 16gb or not I would go for 32gb. Mostly cause of multitasking.

depends what you do
if you're only playing games (excluding outliers like flight simulator or some ultra-modded abomination), anything over 16gb will be unused and wasted
if you're doing video editing, super heavy VMs, things that can use over 16Gb of ram, of course 32gb will be useful

Read OP retard

Since you have to ask, neither

>Read OP retard
>google forms
KILL YOURSELF YOU RETARDED GORILLA NIGGER BOBOON!!!!!!!!! NEVER POST ON HERE AGAIN YOU FAT BLACK BARREL OF TURDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NIGGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Great, thank you.

Wouldn't that increase my gpu unit temperature?

Attached: 1643903088795.png (128x128, 31.96K)

Fastest cpu without pluton

Attached: 2022-01-04_20-39-32-1480x833.png (1480x833, 818.15K)

Best cpu for 3070?

Read OP retard

5950x + 20$ ebay a320

Attached: ql7zYxd.jpg (593x656, 35.75K)

any reason for going with one of the intel cpus in the OP? ive been looking at amd cpus, and they seem to all have a lot more threads at lower prices

If you're asking about whether you should upgrade from 16gb you already have or replace the ram you have with faster ram, the answer is going to be different than if you are building a PC from scratch and don't have 16gb of ram to hand.
If you're buying from scratch, don't skimp on speed just to have the 32gb. But don't fuss if the more expensive RAM speed is at the marginal improvement end of what your CPU+Mobo can handle.

The answer if you have the RAM already depends what speed of ram you have, and what your motherboard and CPU are. If you have a bottleneck, it's beneficial to fix it.
You're unlikely to have a bottleneck from your RAM speed if you bought it at the same price bracket and time as the main components of your PC.
Also, I know this general is consumerist central, so don't feel obligated to throw more money than you can afford to at it, but depending on where you live, it's not too hard to find RAM which is at the speed you want but also at 32gb, for prices which are reasonable. So it's not usually too hard to have the best of both worlds when you're upgrading.

Your use case is also important. From what I've seen, the marginal gains of really high-end RAM over RAM which is next down the list but potentially quite a bit cheaper aren't important. But if you are running into the limits of RAM quantity, increasing the headroom is just a flat benefit. That said, it's currently the case that gaming doesn't really max out 16gb of RAM at the minute. Nor would casual usage so long as you manage your browser tabs realistically.

Why?

Intel has traditionally been faster/more powerful in applications that depend on fewer cores, which has traditionally meant almost all games, as compared to workstation tasks which might benefit from having more cores available.

>my ga-ab350 board is still artificially limited

Attached: guts JUST.jpg (750x797, 94.84K)

Lmao retard

Looking for motherboard advice anons, MSI B660m-a D4, AsRock B660 Pro Rs or Asus B660 Plus
Rest of the sytem - RAM 32GB 3200mhz (2*16), i5 12400F (not looking to remove power limits), 1x M2 PCIE3 ssd, 2x Sata SSD, 6600XT (non OC)
The Asus is 185, the MSI is 160, the AsRock is 140

>threads
That's not how you compare CPUs, numbnuts. I've got an 8350 to sell you cheap if that's all you care about

cheaper and more powerful than a 12900k + overpriced ddr5 board

post your CPU fan curve RIGHT NOW

Attached: 1623932485630.png (795x795, 427.42K)

>overpriced ddr5 board
Ah yes, well if we add 9000 boxes of poptarts to the 5950X cart before checkout, it wouldn't be cheaper, now would it?

Attached: 24wdfk8.png (339x319, 138.01K)

>That's not how you compare CPUs
why not? i thought more threads = faster compiling

You are wrong. 12 thread 5600X is faster than a 16 thread 1700X at compiling

Up to 40°C - 40%
60°C - 80%
80°C - 100%
Fan is 800-2000 RPM. I don't care about efficiency, I just like pretty numbers.

oh, so what should i be looking for when choosing a cpu that is good for compiling big software?

Look at CPU compilation speed tests.

0-70deg = 0%
70-100deg = 100%