Linus vs. RMS

Which do you think is more important to the technology industry?

Attached: rms-linus.jpg (1522x938, 77.9K)

both

Depends who sucks cock better.

linus. rms is like steve jobs; he's basically the face of linux but he doesn't actually do shit

bro, RMS is based

Attached: rms-jobs.jpg (960x540, 528.75K)

biggest btfo is history

Except for the fact that Jobs was a highly successful billionaire with 4 kids and RMS is a childless loser.

RMS by far. Copyleft and FOSS basically wouldn't exist without him. People like to say that it would, but it wouldn't. He signlehandly changed the world.

Are you counting the kid he fathered with the woman who was on welfare before getting a pithy settlement?

I'd say rms is more important, because without the GPL being written then Linux would have been using some easier to exploit license and would have been cannibalized pretty quickly.

I can't tell if RMS in this picture is photoshopped or a cardboard cutout.

He looks high as fuck.

Linus.
Without a kernel, BSDs would have won the unix wars.

Dunno, Wikipedia says he had 4 kids though

Pretty sure it's shopped

That's not Linus, Linus is younger.

If both were never born, nothing of value to the technology industry would be lost.

This is Linus, wtf.

Attached: Linus.png (620x719, 563.88K)

Wow great joke I bet nobody has ever made that one before

Linux is pretty significant. But I guess without it maybe people would just be using FreeBSD instead.

Both are criminals and must be arrested for malware distribution.

i see nothing but a piece of shit when i look at rms now after his vax shilling

Why? GNU and Linux are malware?

Exactly.