Discussion about plan 9.
Plan 9 forks:
>9front: 9front.org
>9legacy: 9legacy.org
Plan 9 original (prefer the forks): 9p.io
Drawterm (access your plan 9 cpu server from any unix):
general: swtch.com
9front's drawterm (dp9ik password support): drawterm.9front.org
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
twitter.com
yes yes
There's no "yes" in plan 9.
BASED TRASH OS
admittedly I've never used plan 9, but I was thinking the other day it would be cool to host a website from a plan 9 vm on my esxi machine. Does plan 9 have a web server and is there a dummies guide somewhere for it?
there is ip/httpd/httpd and rc-httpd.
ip/httpd/httpd is installed my default and the manual for it is httpd(8)
#!/bin/rc
while()
echo yes
>by
kek and fixed
GNU yes for comparison
I don't get why people shill this thing, though I could say the same thing for every "source" based os.
At the end of the day if you have a life worth living your going to want something that works. Arch/Gentoo/Whatever fags just want to waste time. They are deep inside very very suicidal and just want to die.
On the topic of Plan 9 though, it's the same thing. Plan 9 is fucking useless.
There is NOTHING plan9/gentoo/arch/bsd can do that MacOS can't. prove me fucking wrong.
be libre lol
samefag
>samefag
Seems both faster and more lightweight to me.
ok, just install bash to run it
No need, I'll just put it as my init.
great! good job, you sure are a computer
I would assume people who discus technology in a paraguayan fish masturabator forum would like technology, and like using it for fun, its like criticizing someone reading a novel because a picture book "justs works"
y
It's not that people are talking about it because it's their hobby, it's because some people are recommending that people USE it as a daily driver (every "why aren't you using this OS" thread ever).
dont forget gcc lol
y
Wrong when you account for everything needed to run it?
To run it, you just need the binary itself and related libraries if it hasn't been statically compiled. The runtime overhead of it is likely smaller than rc's.
>likely
curious
where do you get your yes binary and libraries from?
same schizo fag doing all these posts
Are you trying to say that you need the whole build environment to run it? Don't be silly. You can easily build on a different machine way ahead of time, using magnitudes more resources than you're willing to invest in it when you run it. You can even just grab someone else's binaries as well. The build environment does not count for its runtime costs.
no i just think youre wrong
