Why does x86 still exist when ARM is simply better?

>a lot cooler
100C throttling is a lot cooler than something else?

Even accepting your bait, you do know that Windows is fully enabled and available on ARM, right?
You're talking about the implementations, not the ISAs. There's exactly zero reason why Intel and AMD couldn't make ARM CPUs that are just as good as their current x86 offerings. If anything, probably better because of the more accommodating memory model and other ISA advantages.

>100C throttling
Yes, Intel and AMD tend to do that. Apple chips on the other hand never throttle.

>Apple chips on the other hand never throttle.
They sure do in their iPhone instantiations.

>Why does x86 still exist when ARM is simply better?
Because americans.
ARM was british, and therefore inferior. So they shill x86 and normies who don't understand jack shit about this just repeated. Once America had hegemony in the consumer market, the server market followed because it became cheap to mass produce stuff in China.

>beats every desktop CPU out there

Attached: mpv-shot0006.jpg (854x480, 108.44K)

define "better", OP
it usually takes a 5-year philosophy course, but try to keep it simple.

I responded to bait, not the other way around user.

It looks big because the M1 has no real turbo state, but in terms of sustained power, they're hardly 20% ahead. Given the process node advantage, you'd arguably expect more. Zen 4 is likely going to absolutely dominate it until Apple can get to N3 before anyone else thanks to "robust conversations" with TSMC.

Attached: mpv-shot0011.jpg (854x480, 74.98K)

>responses to bait cannot themselves be bait

Attached: agjsre5.gif (300x153, 68.05K)