Falkon browser

I can only imagine how poorly shit optimized that generic whitelabel "Adblock" is compared to king ublock

Attached: img-2022-02-03-17-23-06.png (1238x497, 107.31K)

because i use a webkitgtk browser
i prefer to not use chromium and it’s derivatives for ethical reasons

I'm using firefox because I want there to be alternatives to chromium based browsers. Opera is chromium, edge is chromium, qtwebkit is chromium. If we didn't have firefox, chromium would take over everything. And I don't like that idea. I don't like monopolies

>brave adblock 10x slower than ubo
holy kek

Firefox is mostly funded by Google user
theverge.com/2020/8/15/21370020/mozilla-google-firefox-search-engine-browser

Nice observation smart man, the other viable alternative (Apple WebKit) is also funded by google (to the tune of 15 billion dollars). Firefox is the only cross-platform not-chrome browser with its own extension store left. Enjoy your shit add-ons chromecuck

It seems pretty decent actually to tell you the truth.
I have ran both browsers - one with ublock and one with the Falkon adblock side by side - and I am frequently getting faster loads on Falkon

That's because adblock just lets ads through.

>no hard data
Facts don't care about your feelings Rajesh. Run this one in Falkon and Firefox
testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net/performance/chalkboard/

Attached: Screenshot_20220203_173455.png (2560x1440, 265.3K)