32bit backwards comparability

>32bit backwards comparability

Attached: 37a.png (574x596, 159.74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mathematik.uni-ulm.de/users/ag/yaze-ag/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>16bit backwards compatibility

Attached: chad_thinkpad.png (758x644, 245.34K)

bit backwards compatibility

Attached: 738.png (598x800, 103.77K)

>64bit backwards compatibility

Attached: 1628974673705.jpg (1080x1175, 321.55K)

>1bit backwards compatibility

Attached: 1634414703802.jpg (1011x1238, 136.83K)

>backwards compatibility

Attached: kys.jpg (545x600, 24.1K)

>128bit backwards compatibility

Attached: heavypngover100gb.jpg (244x244, 49.69K)

64-bit x86 CPUs are backward compatible with 32, 16 and 8-bit programs for the same architecture by default
it's just that no dev cares to go that deep for their OS

How would one writine and compile an 8bit program in the current year?

32 bit is fst more efficient for 99% of all software

Attached: 1623447586906.png (500x628, 308.1K)

>128bit forward compatibility

Attached: IMG_20220119_081325_526.jpg (907x1129, 271.22K)

sus

Why does there need to be a specific compatibility alert tho? I though 64 but programs meant 64 bits of data can be transferred for usage? Since 32 bits is lesser than 64 bits, doesn't that already make a 64 bit program 32 but compatible

Attached: 1629805765422.gif (976x850, 362.85K)

kys retarded frogposter

dilate & seethe

Attached: 1641723902285.jpg (1138x1212, 1.24M)

I like this soijack, he should be used more

minecraft computer.

x64, but without 32bit backwards comparability and MMU bullshit
^^^ the God choicen TempleOS CPU

dancing_swede.webm

mathematik.uni-ulm.de/users/ag/yaze-ag/

x86 doesn't have an 8 bit mode. The platform has always been at least 16 bits.