>thinking that's a good thing
Windows Subsystem for POSIX was and is a steaming pile of shit.
These were both released in the year 2000
James Scott
Blake Murphy
It's not. It's a genuine implementation of a Unix system call API and its userland was derived from OpenBSD, recognised as a fine Unix. The early versions were primitive but the later Interix found from Win2k onwards was much more sophisticated. It could even run GNOME or KDE (love how GNOME morons today are basedfacing over the prospect of doing this with WSL2g.)
Leo Hughes
So is NT. WSL1 was abandoned because NT's file I/O design is so braindead that operations on large git repos were actually faster in a VM.
Zachary Rivera
Mac OS X was real UNIX, Windows will never be a real UNIX
Zachary Young
Nothing has beat the look of this since
Aiden Nguyen
>this is what wintoddlers legitimately believe
Windows Vista look was comfy. Can't lie.
Grayson Torres
neither of them were
windows 2000 came out in 1999, and mac os x in 2001
Asher Robinson
KDE2 also came out in 2000.
Carson Nguyen
I want to go back
Oliver Collins