What year should they have won the rumble?

What year should they have won the rumble?

Attached: 9DECF302-A1FB-46BA-A88D-3473F989CB7D.jpg (800x500, 43.13K)

Jericho - 2012, 2016
Angle - 2002
2003 is a toss-up year between angle and jericho

It was weird they didn't do it in 2012, but I suppose they got him in the world title picture anyways. He didn't really need it to get into the Punk angle.

Angle was already the wwe champ in 03

Jericho should never have won it. He has proven himself to be a disloyal self mark, so Vince was right to never afford him that honor.

Taking the belt off or having anyone beat Lesnar until Wrestlemania XIX was fucking retarded and it only makes sense from a dimes standpoint to Goldberg push him

Angle should've won 2004

Benoit was a no dimes shitter, Angle v HBK at Mania

Goldberg Undertaker
Angle Michaels whc
Lesnar Guerrero wwe
Jericho Benoit
Rock Orton
This works for sure

Which goes last?

Undertaker/Goldberg. if that isn't obvious to you, you're a smark retard and need to kys

Angle HBK obviously

If this isn't obvious to you, you're a retard who think carder v Goldberg who everybody already knows is jobbing and leaving is a good main event

you tell me

>Jericringe
Never
>Angle
2007

Jericho: 2000
Angle: 2002

Angle - Never
Jericho - 2012

Jericho in 2000 to challenge rock, rock wins in 2002 to beat Hogan for the wcw title

>Angle
2003 I guess? That is really the only year that works I mean I know Cunter sucks but he had the crowd behind him in 2002
>Jeribloat
2012 I still don't get why that antidraw shitter Sheamus won

Angle never needed it.
Jericho that year he was supposed to before they changed it to Sheamus.

Angle in 2002
Jericho in never evvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvverrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This

This

Based Russo