Promiscuous men should be the primary shaming targets, not women. With great strength comes great responsibility...

Promiscuous men should be the primary shaming targets, not women. With great strength comes great responsibility. Dating market is a supply/demand thing. If demand suddenly dropped, the supply side would have to lower prices. Men hold the power to just stop having sex with women. Imagine if all men stopped at once. Men can't be raped by women, so there is absolutely nothing women could do about it. They would have to beg for a crumb of sperm if the human race is to survive. Complete role reversal is possible if only men were more coordinated. You should be mad at the traitor men who are preventing this from becoming reality.

Attached: ecfcf649-fe5f-4add-9a01-26533cbd578a_1920x1080.jpg (1920x1080, 148.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42366629
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>With great strength comes great responsibility.
>So we should shun men who have to work for it, not women who hold the power of gatekeeping
Depenalize rape and we have a deal.

Those who shame are shameful. For that is proof of their weakness, inability to prevent it and remain incels.

i think the core of it is why those guys are attractive to women
women are attracted to a phenotype and its important to understand what that is so that society doesnt design children into thirty year old virgins

I support this, if female chemical contraception is banned.

Lol no. I have fucked probably a dozen women that had boyfriends/husbands. Dont care

This is, in fact, what feminists mean by "patriarchy". This is why the "we have it worse" rhetoric of men's rights movements talks past them. The fact that men die in wars, according to feminist theory, is that man continue to wage wars. It's patriarchy; patriarchal ideals like strength and domination.

Im average as shit. Tall and mentally ill. Never had a problem getting womens attention

Most rape can't be proven. What's stopping you from saying she consented? It's her word against yours and 98% of all rape accusations go nowhere because there is simply no evidence.

>So we should shun men who have to work for it, not women who hold the power of gatekeeping.
Yes, because women already gatekeep too much. Forcing women to be more selective is the opposite of what you want. You want them to lower their standards. This can only happen if Chads refuse to have sex or give any attention to more than one woman in their life, so the rest will have to find someone else.

Won't happen. If I don't fuck them some weak willed punk will so I will continue to say yes when women ask

Outside of the incelweb, nobody cares about this stuff. Genuinely, the number of robots could quadruple and it would still be an insignificant, disengaged minority of faggots crying and watching the world keep on keeping on. None of you moids can regulate your own behaviour, so what chance do you have of organising every single one of you into coordinated abstinence?

>he does not know

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42366629

there are a ton of advantages of seeing society from an incels point of view
especially if you struggled after being raised by societies point of view and never understood why everyone always shit on you

The only shame that needs to happen is against SINGLE WOMEN.
Promiscuous men or women aren't the problem. In fact, there are many women who remain mostly sexless because they lust for some mega chad they can't get.
Monogamy needs to make a return, it's the only way that the bottom half of men can get laid

This only proves my point. He wasn't instantly pronounced guilty just based on a woman's word. There was an investigation. It found no evidence of rape and he went free. Working as intended.

i agree with you, as do most men
do not let the vocal minority of fratbro fuckboys and horny sex addict chads fool you
most people, at least from my experience, are against promiscuity
although it's also on the women to keep their legs shut as well, it's not entirely on the men
but still, shaming manwhores should be more common
find a wife, build a family, contribute to your community, stop being such a degenerate piece of shit

the world belongs to men, simps and horny fuckboys are the reason the western world sucks right now

Why not single men? They are causing all the single women by being so undesirable that forgoing intimacy (a basic human need) is preferable to being with them. It should be shameful to be so repulsive.

The starting premise is trash. The bottom half of men should not get laid. Your only argument in support of the premise is that you want it. It is not a good argument to support something so terrible for society.

Chads fucking women below their looksmaxx is the main issue with our sexual society. Think about it.
>ugly girl fucks chad
>ugly guy who's supposed to match with ugly girl is left with zero options
>ugly guy is a sexless incel until ugly girl decides to "settle"
>ugly guy now has to deal with the ugly girl's brain damage from years of fucking the most attractive men
It's a plague, through and through.

This. Plus the bottom half of men are worse than the bottom half of women due to greater male variability. Women are all clustered towards the middle of trait distribution, while men have long bell curve tails of both amazing people and complete genetic trash with no equivalent among women that matches those extremes. The trash shouldn't breed.

Exactly, it's the Chads who should be shamed and controlled. Women are soft, naive and gullible.They evolved to be agreeable and submissive which is a good thing for oiling the gears of society and reducing conflict, so we can't blame them for being like this. We should blame men who are taking advantage of these traits and abusing them for their own benefit, at the expense of not just women, but society as a whole.

if the bottom half of men don't have access to sex/relationships, they will simply opt out of society, and society collapses.
You need the betas to build roads and shit. Every successful civilization ever has had monogamy as it's most central building block

shit, meant for obviously
but for I can say this:
Women don't care about absolutes, they care about relatives. There will always be someone below average. If someone below average gets their shit together and becomes above average, someone will be pushed down. Someone will always be worse than the rest, and those guys are screwed either way.

Did you miss 5he part where his life was ruined for years you fucking mongoloid

Men need to be regimented and fitter. There's just so many fat guys out there.

Excess men used to be sent off to die in a war or conquer other lands (and stay there) and nothing collapsed. I'd even argue that we have too much labour supply, which creates non-livable wages. There are way too many bullshit jobs, useless plastic trinkets and so much food we are dying from overeating. All of that crap could go along with the workforce that generates it, and we'd be better off.

>woman do the picking
>they can't be responsible for their choices
Yeah no, tell you what, if you weren't raped you are responsible for who you sleep with.

>I'm average
>tall
You are not average then

Oh no, poor Chad. Maybe next time he'll think before fucking so many women without committment.

Women don't have a problem. They prefer it this way compared to being dependent on men and having to settle, even if it means being single. Men are the ones whining, so men should be policing each other to fix their side.