Modernity = inceldom

No modern women are free for love. They are all dating from the start, being gf's in relationships that will not last but will keep them away from real dedicated love (mariage and vows). They get fucked and spoiled. A lot of them turn gay, or even more bisexuals (another way to get spoiled), most collect mental problems invented by (((modern medecine))) or arrogance promoted by feminism and the general individualism. People are only judged according to money, even intellectuals or soldiers, a logical conclusion of materialism (the idea that there is only matter in this world, thus what fills the belly becomes the only value).
These women don't want to be courted anymore, there is too much people and no trust between them. Women hate on men because of feminism. It is said men have been oppressors for millennials and their strength is looked down upon, but now they still have to give profit to the woman. Women will divorce and take the kids, infidelity is seen as normal and is now named "polyamory". Love is said to only be a chemical, thus no relationship is sacred or very profound. Sacres vows are looked down upon accordingly. All people are judged by looks, clothes, or any trending superficial factor you need to bend to (blending in with normalfaggots).
Then all the practical aspects of daily family life are altered.

Attached: 1656199967060.jpg (1100x619, 107.96K)

as much as you might have some incel point you are just using these issues to manipulate peopel into empowering their enemy which is conservatives as well

these issues are highly subjective abysses as well, the most judgmental people don't care about your clothes or anything and they hate normies because they think they've 1upped them in some way but they're all just passive aggressive and that's one thing they don't want to let go of, people are deeply parasitical in nature, not just in language but movements across time, memes, they'll take over your soul

anyway attacks on liberalism are retarded to me in particular since trump and putin

as soon as abortion got banned there was a 10 year old that needed one, the darkness of humanity does not give af and you are not allowed to do anything

You don't deserve those quads.
Abortion allows for hookup culture which spoils women and it spoils women in itself,making them kill their own offspring. Feminity is looked down upon in regard to it's good traits. And degenerate chas are allowed to pump and dump and now they even dump their babies.
What do you have against trump or putin on these subject ?
My initial post was lazy anyway because I have too much rage in me.

>wanting to burden the system with more unwanted children

no

>more strain on the system is a bad thing
>we need to free up resources to finance roastie's stay on the cock carrousel for longer

>more strain on the education system
>more strain on the welfare system
>more strain on child services
>all this leads to more crime
>these are all apparently good and necessary because the idea of women being able to have sex angers you THAT much

Your priorities are all mixed up my man

I'm not even american, couldn't care less for higher crime in burgerland. I just want to watch it all burn.

chads*
If the system doesn't work, it doesn't work. Abortion allows this bad system to continue.

Banning it only makes it worse, much worse.

You would have to greatly increase the spending on social programs that allow people to safely have and support children. But the people who want to ban abortion don't want to do that either. Quite the opposite in fact.

>But the people who want to ban abortion don't want to do that either. Quite the opposite in fact.
It directly answers you.
They don't like this system. It doesn't work, it might precisely be their point. So for it to sabotage the system is good for them but bad for you because you're attached to it for whatever reason.

Cutting social services, further corporate deregulation, and forced birth feels like the opposite direction of advancing humanity.

Unless you're part of the wealthy elite, then it aligns with your interests quite well.

You do not have to increase welfare spending. You can just let then starve.

>Forced birth

kek. Getting pregnant is a choice. Not using a condom is a choice, not using any contraceptive is a choice, getting rawdog dicked by Chad is a choice, not paying attention to the fertility window is a choice. All those choices lead to pregnancy.

Abortions should only be allowed in extreme cases in sexual assault and rape. The casual use of abortions is not meant to be a substitute for contraception and a functioning brain.

Attached: 1657553626540.jpg (1013x1013, 165.96K)

>Modernity
Let's see:
>Polyamory
As old as time, has been around for thousands of years and normalized in many non western cultures
>Abortion
Ancient practice. The idea that pro-life was the default throughout history was really only true of Jews and Catholics. Most others didn't really assign value to human life in the same way we do now so it wasn't seen as a big deal. Benjamin Franklin wrote a guide on at-home abortions. The Chinese historically have been more or less abortion experts.
>Practical aspects of daily family life
Have varied greatly throughout human history across the world. Many prosperous societies had a more communal way of raising children.

>forced birth
kek
>cutting social services
Not indiscriminately. And cutting the corresponding taxes.
>corporate
Not everything is socialism vs capitalism, there are other system that the state or the money, but your masters don't want you to know it.
>advancing humanity
Is not about killing babies to save a shitty system
If you are a leftist, see anarchism.

>Polyamory
Is not the same as polygamy for the very wealthy, not the same as free women, not the same as very ancient freedom in a tribe. Also, not everything ancient is good, I never said that. I said that modernity is bad. So, so some tribes are degenerate.

>Abortion ancient practice.
Wew le Benjamin franklin ! Le some chinese medecine man.
It's rejected in judaism, islam, christianity, hinduism, buddhism, shikkism,... I don't know about all religions but anyway hinduism is the oldest of them all. In taoism too apparently, makes perfect sense. So cultures have always had their conflict or breach, chocking.
>Practical aspects of daily family life
Have varied greatly throughout human history
And ? Modern daily life in general is shit, couple life is shit, it doesn't mean there were no variations of practicalities back then.
>communal children
The communities were smaller and known, it never legitimate modern cuckoldry and general atomization of the last part of stability against the state and money. Also not every single tribes were good back then.

How much of an actual loser do you have to be to be so moved to write this entire post

>not yet a human
I agree, women aren't human quite yet,m we gave them rights too soon.

All this is good.
Increas in general suffering is good.

I thought about this indeed. A heartless "mother" like that isn't human and her foetus is far more than her kek

A big one, I admit.

theres nothing wrong in OP but whats missing is that modern normie men are all this and worse