Hello, new user here, incels, why do you choose to be an incel by not visiting a hooker?

I just came here after seeing a video on youtube that exposes this problematic incel hiding place. The video is on the trending tab in youtube at the moment.
youtu.be/0sWURjk8H6w

Incels, if you care so much about losing your virginity then why don't you get a hooker? You are all repressing homosexuals for being this obsessed with losing your virginity when it costs less than 50 dollars to buy a hooker and still refusing such offers. And then you wonder why so many of you get groomed into being trannies.

Also why do you feel entitled to sex/happiness? You don't deserve to be happy if your existence is based around harassing women in person, raping them and getting them unconscious in order to rape them at parties. You are not entitled to anything, not even suicide because you will only hurt others around you with that.

Attached: images (21).jpg (224x225, 6.84K)

Condom sex is not real sex and fucking a hooker raw is a great way to get super mega crabs who have AIDS

You must be non-American. I wish I was you.

If your main problem is being a celibate, why not lose your virginity through a hooker? That would pretty much solve your problem wouldn't it?

Such a normalfag way of seeing sex... How is there any validation from fucking a hooker?

>faggot
>normalfag

Please stop being homophobic.

I'm not enough of a beg to pay for sex.

but buying sex is illegal where I am.

We are not all stalkers here sir. In fact I'm the one getting stalked. As for suicide, I think that's a great topic up for debate.

The whole reiko situation was a larp. The pinkpill and gay shilling was very problematic though

Where the fuck do you find $50 hookers?

Attached: 1635418446873.jpg (811x1081, 287.65K)

I'm not, you're just being a faggot
I know you're being stalked they're outside now according to the schedule.

is there even any proof of there being a link between reiko and shuaby?

They are here because they couldn't handle my spicy opinions on euthanasia.

It happened during the whole grooming allegations so people just stuck with it. I don't remember there being a link or any proof of a connection

because their problem isn't being celibate, it's being loveless

Attached: loveless.jpg (660x660, 94.6K)

get the fuck off my board normalfag
originel cumment

seeing a trans escort tommorow, to find out if im bi or not

Attached: FThIeZcXoAAYMkz.jpg (933x895, 102.61K)

We aren't incels, we're robots. Here's an old copypasta to explain"

"We are robots not incels. Incels should be shot. Let me elaborate.
INCEL DOES NOT EQUATE TO VIRGIN.
I believe most of the people on here have forgotten what it really means to be a robot. Older robots mostly never identified as incels, and the word only became popular here after leddit shutdown some place on their site. "Incels" are a bunch of sex obsessed degenerate faggot coomer orbiters. We are first and foremost robots, something I class as a distinct identity, removed from the identity of incel. You may now probably be asking yourself what a robot is then, if not an incel? Well the definitions and differences between the two identities is explained thus:
Robots are male outcasts that are virgin, with EMPHASIS on one's nature as an outcast, although virginity and being male are still mandatory parts of robotdom.

Incels are involuntary celibates, basically an identity that is "I want sex, I can't have sex". Because of this, inceldom is inherently an identity tied to lack of sex. Tying the definition to a dichotomy(incel/volcel) allows the definition to be attacked very easily. A normalfag can say "You can't be an incel, unless someone is physically restraining you from having sex, simply because your beliefs or self/looks repulse people does not mean you don't have the ability to either change your beliefs or rape someone". Mind you, identifying as someone whose identity is tied to lack of sex is pathetic. Robots are outcasts, outsiders.

Robotdom does not have this flaw because it doesnt attach much of it's meaning to that dichotomy of voluntary/involuntary, but rather to it's outcast status. Robots instead claim that, their status as outcasts is coercive. Robots are in essence saying, "Yes, I'm choosing to suck your dick, but you're coercing me into that choice by pointing a gun at my head and telling me you are gonna shoot me if I don't". Coercion in this case is immoral."

Robot subculture died and now, it's the incel subculture that's still about and somewhat popular for male outcasts to attach themseleves to online if they want to. Majority of older robots that posted here that took on that identity unironically got their lives together and are in betabux relationships now. Same thing is gonna happen to the current edgy zoomer incels and another subculture will become popular or takeover that one. It is what it is

doesn't matter, the difference between the two is negligible
the biggest myth is that it's a choice or depends on something you can/can't do

Difference is pretty big, robots don't really care about sex, atleast not as much as incels. They don't make it their personality, that would be their nature as outcasts.

id say robots and incels merged.
why do normies always parrot this dogshit? you know incels dont want *just* sex right? they want to be loved by someone not named their mother

it really isn't, the two are very intertwined
what the ACTUAL difference is in the approach people have to said outcast status
and it just so happens that incels stereotypically blame the world (and particularly women) for their problems, but not all are like that
what doesn't change is their status of outcasts/incels