Post things bluepillers CANNOT refute or argue with

Post things bluepillers CANNOT refute or argue with.

Attached: 1630334740312.png (2757x2757, 153.7K)

Let's see the okcupid chart. Imagine being so stupid to think someone can be successful on dating apps LOL.

>Let's see the okcupid chart.
>Imagine being so stupid to think someone can be successful on dating apps LOL.
You can if you are Chad

Attached: 1649409880365.png (503x644, 18.84K)

Women just want that big black cock all day. Post the 30% incel chart.

It get that its harder to meet women but imagine the kind of of personality who would use online dating? Is that really who you want? I don't bother with online dating because I know the type of women that are on there are completely incompatable with me. Online dating has done irrepairable damage but theres no use sulking over it because you will never ever find anyone on there who would love you

Attached: 1538438227210.jpg (540x796, 34.03K)

>Yeah it's bad and you should give up but like, just stop bitching bro

in otherwords taking data from Tinder or whatever is comprable to survey bias

Attached: 1653956227573.png (1024x742, 1.11M)

I never said you should give up I just said you need to write off online dating entirely which is eaiser said than done. Its for whores.

Post the chart where less than 20% of men participate in sports or exercise. The time where anybody meets in real life is over. Everyone is too fat and too porn addicted.

I can't blame women for this. They have complete sexual selection so naturally they're going to pick the tall, attractive chad nearly every time. Just like if you had sexual selection you'd pick the hot Stacy with DD tits every time.

> Everyone is too fat and too porn addicted.
If that applies to you then you can fix it in order to find other people that escaped it. There are VERY VERY few of them but why wouldn't you try? I workout because of my job and there are plenty of women at the gym

Attached: 1653751355594.jpg (1500x1012, 166.45K)

I need you to post the chart that shows women don't actually exist. 99% of society is male, that's the red pill.

yeah probably. 20% of the population does 80% of the work and I'd wager most of that aformentioned 20% is male

Attached: 1651912270103.jpg (1075x744, 510.49K)

Males work 100% of important jobs

>Post the chart where less than 20% of men participate in sports or exercise.
I have a feeling "exercise" for most of that 20% is going on walks or something.

Yeah probably. Males are the primary producers while females are always the highest consumers. I wouln't discount the medical field in which females are over represented

Attached: 1653774886888.png (542x571, 202.44K)

Females are 50% of the population, so no they aren't overrepresented being 34% of doctors and 22% of surgeons

Whats the stat for nurses or midwives?

Attached: azov_hitler_special_forces.png (844x782, 586.84K)

Not that women are supposed to work anyways. They are better suited to caring for chidlren rather than producing capital

Attached: 1653844821338.jpg (850x1099, 126.08K)

I always see these posts on here, as if the fact that women are more selective than men is winning some sort of argument.
Yes, women are more selective.
It is LITERALLY evolution. In history, the chances of dying during childbirth were as high as 1 out of 20.
The women who selected for the men with the best genes were the most likely to survive childbirth.

You are blaming them for a trait they evolved to stay alive.

>But there's less risk today, why aren't they less selective already wtf?
Not how evolution works.

Attached: 1617852543288.png (133x133, 25.75K)

Modern women don't even have children

Is this supposed to be a problem? There are nearly 8,000,000,000 people on Earth today. We don't need more Africans and chinks.

I am merely responding to your retarded musings and the idea that this is for children (that women do not even have) and not hedonism

Explain how I am retarded. What I posted is scientific evidence.
Women do have children, back awhile ago they had many children, so chances of dying from childbirth were higher.
Women of today? Around 1.6 kids per woman, so I am told. Not quite high enough to replace the current population, and that's fine. Allows them to give each kid more attention.