Are girlfriends "earned"? Are guys with girlfriends just harder working than guys without them? Why do so many "advice experts" try to draw some connection between "putting work in" and romantic success? Are you really guaranteed a girlfriend if you complete a certain list of tasks?
Pic related: A man with a good personality who was chosen over all you nice guys, genetic freaks, and beta males.
The problem here is that modern women simultaneously want to directly make the contradictory claims of "You can't earn a girlfriend" and "The reason you don't have a girlfriend is because of your bad qualities." These two statements cannot both be true at the same time. But women want both of them available to use, at varying times and for different purposes.
Have you ever heard of something called "probability"? What is the chance that your father had any sex?
No one seems to think about how little sense this makes either.
>Love can't be earned, forced, or negotiated. You're not entitled to anyone's love.
>In order to find someone who will love you have to get fit, shower often, dress well, have a good haircut, have a well-paying job, have interesting hobbies, treat women with respect, etc. If you do these things you will be entitled to someone's love. (Even though there's tons of men who have none of these qualities who have tons of success with women).
>Rape
>Rape
>Rape
>Rape
Originally
It's luck. The main thing you need is social connections, which means being in the vicinity of people who are nice and compatible with you. Not everyone gets that luxury.
The one that robots seem to struggle with is that you can't have "women have high standards" and also believe that people are "born attractive".
I never even considered that. Wow
Those aren't contradictory at all retard.
>the contradictory claims of "You can't earn a girlfriend" and "The reason you don't have a girlfriend is because of your bad qualities."
The contradiction disappears once you realize that the intention of these statements is not to advise you, but to make you shut up.
The "bad qualities" statement is to make you shut up and go away and improooooove yourself. The "you can't earn a gf" statement is to deal with anyone who actually improooooves themselves, to get THEM to shut up and go away.
You are making the mistake of thinking that bluepillers and women care about your outcome. They don't. They care about coming up with a way to make you speak less near them.
It's contradictory by definition. Standards are irrelevant if people are just born to fuck certain people and have no choice about it or ability to change how they look.
Your genetics determine your apperance.
Correct. Men and women are designed from birth to have sex and reward the best genetics. There are no "high" standards, there are just THE standards
They are high if most people are mediocre.
Don't those thug niggers wind up fathering like 10 children before they get into fried chicken induced coma? No clue what connection le experts speak of
>Are girlfriends "earned"? Are guys with girlfriends just harder working than guys without them? Why do so many "advice experts" try to draw some connection between "putting work in" and romantic success? Are you really guaranteed a girlfriend if you complete a certain list of tasks?
>Pic related: A man with a good personality who was chosen over all you nice guys, genetic freaks, and beta males.
Women are people. People can reject you or accept you for whatever reason they want based on what internal standards are that you, and possibly they, have no idea of ever knowing. To seek the approval of others is futile. Even if it is for pair bonding. Even if it's for sex.
It is far more effective and logical, given the current societal situation, for men to harden and adapt to the harsher romantic climate and thrive with being single. A man who relies on another for anything gives power to them, but a man who either has not the need, or can get that need met himself has his power secure. It's hard, but train yourself to require other people less and less for things and cut them off. That way you do not need anyone's approval and can still get the things you want.
>Women are people
Top kek
Thats up to genetics to decide
Well said. I came to this realization recently myself.
The thing is
Women dont react to good personality good morals or good intelligence
Women react to good looks and good atitude (by this I mean being forward, slightly dominant, extroverted, knowing what you want and how to get it, being in control of yourself and not e
Leeting other peolle inflluence you, not being a doormat or a whiny bitch, knowing how and when to touch her while talking, how to escalate things and how to handle her during sex, etc) - what redpillers refer to as game, wothout the manipulstion tactics of PUAs
But it has to be inner game for it to be effecrive, fake game wont go very far (recommended book:models by mark mason)
So both "gfs are earned" and "women choosedumb abusive assholes" can be right
Women dont choose based on the first list of categories, they choose by the sevond. The problem is that they and the cultural environment makes us think its by the first, and when we spend years in education and work to be a good man, we find whores sucking other guys dicks at clubs bathoorms. Why do you think father and mother used to choose the groom, not the wife?
>Thats up to genetics to decide
Yeah