Femanons what do you think of dicks with phimosis? Foreskin in general as well

Femanons what do you think of dicks with phimosis? Foreskin in general as well

Attached: phimosis-treatments_1469_l.jpg (640x427, 49.9K)

phimosis is fucking disgusting, absolutely revolting

Disclaimer: I do not promote or support circumcision outside those of homosexual or trans origins who deserve much worse.
Cut looks better. It just does. Uncut looks weird especially the head. Phimosis is similar in weirdness just in it's own way and it also makes me wonder is sex still a thing it can do? Isn't the head being exposed basically required?
That being said, penises in general just look weird and the whole concept is weird so it's not like being cut fixes that status.
And now we wait for 80 anons to kneejerk REEEE and read nothing else past cut looks better and then the obsessed user with a dick photo collection shows up to post the most cherry picked instances of bad and botched circumcisions but then posts exactly the reasons why uncut head looks weird.
Let's just hit the FF button on this one and call it done.

>Sacrificing your own sexual pleasure by mutilating your genitals just so your partner thinks your cock looks better flaccid
Do americans/mudslimes/kikes really?

Attached: 1627315110017.jpg (740x704, 125.87K)

phimosis is easy to fix. i had it severely and slowly stretched my skin in the shower over the course of 2 weeks or so.

Too scary.
Dick hurty owie.

>uncut looks worse
Doesn't an uncut boner look basically like cut boner?
>penises in general just look weird
Sounds more like a (you) problem then

He said stretch not rip

You either don't have a penis or a foreskin.

>Doesn't an uncut boner look basically like cut boner?
No. Loose skin on an already weird looking thing just makes it look worse and the head is this weird flesh colored nub that looks greasy. It's just not a good look on an already weird looking thing.
>Sounds more like a (you) problem then
Go back and check any of the other instances of these threads. Women thinking penises just look weird is a fairly common deal. The only reason guys don't think the same is because you're psychologically attached to them with multiple vested interests so you mistake importance with actual aesthetic. Same reason poors consistently rate big boobs the best despite them being actual detriments to child rearing.

>Doesn't an uncut boner look basically like cut boner?
They look basically the same when the foreskin is back on uncut. An uncut penis can look circumcised but a circumcised penis can't look uncut.

Phimosis looks bad, but you can cure it by doing stretching, it might be a bit painful if your dick is full size and you never did it when you were young but it's possible. My foreskin was tight when I was young but I managed to get it back wit stretching, now it glides back and forth easily.

The head looks nearly exactly the same if the penis is erect, there's famous uncut pornstars that people don't even realize are uncut. My recommendation to any guy that has it is hop in a hot bath with some kind of lubricant while your penis is flacid and do your best to stretch and get it over the head, it might be a bit painful but you can do it. Once you do it the first time it will get easier each time, then you will be able to do it when you're hard. Getting cut should be the very last option.

Looks like alien parasite worms attached to their bodies

No, it really doesn't. Genuinely the head not looking greasy does make the head look better. Overall it also causes a 2 tone effect with a sharp delineation at the scar whereas uncut has no delineation so it all sort of runs into eachother until you hit the head which just looks like this weird exposed bit of flesh that is oily or something.
Unless the guy has the shortest foreskin or something so the head is never covered and looses the oil coated look and also never has a skin collar effect because there is no excuse from the short length I'm just not seeing it.
Unless that's actually a thing. Still waiting on if phimosis actually prevents sex from being felt or not as well.

Oh, and isn't the steroid cream the better option? Doesn't that whole method actually do stuff like promote more skin growth so your foreskin actually becomes a little looser rather than just being overly stretched and strained skin which can cause nerve damage?

From personal experience it doesn't prevent sex at all. I feel pleasure and am able to cum normally

Huh. But it still doesn't go back? Isn't the whole inside and head the whole erogenous bit? If its covered isn't that just like masturbating with you foreskin or something? Why chase sex then?

Imagibe being pro Mutilation original

Took me a bit longer than that but yeah it's a pretty easy fix once I plucked up the courage to do it (though I did it in a bath rather than shower). It was painful and felt like it shouldn't happen but it's completely safe so long as its done gradually.

>let me ignore the post and immediately attack the strawman
there is a foreskin in both pictures, retard

Phismosis lowers the pleasure of sex a lot because there is no real stimulation of the head of the penis which is the most sensitive part where most of the pleasure is derived from.

To the femanon who said it looks greasy what do you think of cut guys with heads with lines and creases

Also what do you think about the fact that for cut guys you still need to stretch the shaft skin or get the tip and scar area wet enough that it looks close to uncut for sex and hand jobs to work

>femanon
Strange way of spelling yid.

Also all your comments about uncut dicks are relative from the perspective of a cutting culture.
But your trying to pre empty any discussion of your opinions as"accusing of being pro cutting" or"cherry picked" you don't have a penis you don't even understand now a guy can be stimulated though foreskin you might just have seen enough penises to have the "objective" no bullshit opinion your trying to present

Not seen*