How bad is being raped ACTUALLY?

How bad is being raped ACTUALLY?
I can't help but feel the resulting trauma as presented in media is being inflated for political reasons.

Attached: FEmHqqXX0AgtZCB.png (850x478, 414.67K)

It's just feminist propaganda. Explain to me how it's more traumatic for a girl to get drunk and regret having sex with a guy the next day than it is for a man to be turned into a literal vegetable after getting robbed by niggers who used his head as a football?

It's inflated because women used to be a man's property and we didn't want our property to be used by others. It became rooted in religion and culture. Even though religious influence has died down and women have rights now, the cultural influences on rape still last.

Women adapted to avoid rape but on some level I think they like it because those women who resisted too much to violence were killed. Every woman seems to have some violence and degradation kink.

It's only really bad if you're a child. Hell, it's not even an understandable outcome if you're an adult.

Well let's distinguish two aspects here:
1) Rape in the legal sense
2) Rape as in "forced intercourse against the will of the victim"
Both can happen simultaneously, but considering that the former might appear during fully consensual intercourse I want to exclude it from my observation.

Considering the latter case it is absolutely horrendous and the effects are well documented. It's not "some made up shit by feminists".
Getting raped will forever stain your mind. It will plunge a person into a spiral of self hate and possibly suicide. In most cases a healthy sexuality and a healthy relationship to your own body can never exist again.

Getting sexually assaulted is in many ways much worse than regular assault.

Just because you lack the capacity to sympathize with people who are different from you, that should not lead you to the idea that you know everything.

If in doubt: Read about it. Read studies, and articles and you will get yourself a good reality check.

>It will plunge a person into a spiral of self hate and possibly suicide. In most cases a healthy sexuality and a healthy relationship to your own body can never exist again.
It's crazy how weak/pathetic women are.

Bullying does all of that yet rape is considered 1000x worse

>It will plunge a person into a spiral of self hate and possibly suicide. In most cases a healthy sexuality and a healthy relationship to your own body can never exist again.
It's crazy how weak/pathetic women are.

>getting sexually assaulted is in many ways much worse than regular assault.
Why? Name a reason. Don't just state it.

You forgot men can be on the receiving end of penetrative rape.

It depends.
If you're a man getting fucked up the ass by another man it's traumatizing.
If you're a woman and you're drunk and some non chad uses your hole for 15 minutes then it's not a big deal.

Everything is a spectrum, and possibly there's a zone where bullying has similarly severe outcomes as rape - it's just harder to measure and prove.

>It's crazy how weak/pathetic women are.
As stated:
You forgot men can be on the receiving end of penetrative rape. It just doesn't happen that often.
I might want to add that rape does not even necessarily require penetration, but that would bring us to very technical discussions, so we would stray too far from the discussion.
>Why? Name a reason.
Because the result of sexual abuse hits the human psyche much harder than getting punched in the face.
There's studies about it. If I remember correctly it mostly revolves around a multiplication of privacy, degradation and amount of abuse.

Except studies on these topics are unreliable. There literally rewrote Mein Kampf with feminist buzzwords and it got published in a scientific journal.

how is rape political?

We will never understand it, and I don't mean because we are men and not women. We will never understand it as a subset of humans, who share similar qualities such as "posting on Any Forums" and "enjoy STEM subjects".

To enjoy the aforementioned qualities, somehow also implies that the connection between our mind and bodies is not as foundational to the existence of our "self" as for a normie.
Consider, you likely do not enjoy dancing, parties, sports, hiking. These are examples of physical activities which involve the body interacting with the physical world. For us, our main activities on earth involve interaction with thoughts and abstractions. Even if you were a mechanic who worked on physical systems of cars, I would wager that your main satisfaction from that activity involves the mental construct of the system and the manipulation of that system in your mind.

Because of this entirely different form of existing, your body being raped is not as horrific as for a roastie. I could try to think of an equivalent analogy of rape for us, but there really is not one.

>Well Iet's distinguish two aspects here:
>1) Rape in the IegaI sense
>2) Rape as in "forced intercourse against the will of the victim"
>Both can happen simultaneously, but considering that the former might appear during fully consensual intercourse I want to exclude it from my observation.
>Considering the latter case it is absolutely horrendous and the effects are well documented. It's not "some made up shit by feminists".
>Getting raped will forever stain your mind. It will plunge a person into a spiral of self hate and possibly suicide. In most cases a healthy sexuality and a healthy relationship to your own body can never exist again.
>Getting sexually assaulted is in many ways much worse than regular assault.
>Just because you lack the capacity to sympathize with people who are different from you, that should not lead you to the idea that you know everything.
>If in doubt: Read about it. Read studies, and articles and you will get yourself a good reality check.

Attached: 917.png (811x1049, 218.47K)

>Because the result of sexual abuse hits the human psyche much harder than getting punched in the face.
Seems like bullshit to me. I don't see anything backing that up, other than feminist propaganda which is designed to minimize societies compassion for men, and increase it's compassion for women.

Having drunk sex vs having someone give you life altering injuries? It's ridiculous how were meant to assume they are the same.

>There's studies
There's studies on UFO sightings too.

>privacy, degradation
Yeah, because no one has their privacy violated nor feels degraded when they are beaten severely and robbed.

>Except studies on these topics are unreliable.
Psychologists observe victims and gather the experience gained from what happened and how to best deal with it. There is no conspiracy about it.

makes women (the larger half of the gender split) want to vote for authoritarians who offer "protection" in the form of over-reachign laws that are actually just power grabs. you see this in every liberal city in america.

why do you see liberals as authoritarians?

>observe victims
So it's self reported? Of course women lie/exaggerate their reactions to events.

>Seems like bullshit to me. I don't see anything backing that up, other than feminist propaganda
Well if everything that does not back up your point of view becomes feminist propaganda I understand how you come to that conclusion.

>Having drunk sex vs having someone give you life altering injuries?
You're mixing the legal term, some gray areas with the popular definition. I'm solely talking about violently having sex with someone against their consent.

>There's studies on UFO sightings too.
And that's the fallacy fallacy. Just because some data is unreliable does not mean all is.
If we wanna stay with the analogy there has been the equivalent of millions of ufo sightings all over the world by independent organizations about accredited specialists. If that were the case I'd be scared.

>Yeah, because no one has their privacy violated nor feels degraded when they are beaten severely and robbed.
There's a difference in severity between being punched and wallet taken vs raped. Ask yourself what would you rather have done to you, and how you come to that conclusion. Think.

There are multiple ways one can interpret and twist results to fit an agenda. In certain fields there isn't much critical peer review happening and if they fit a certain narrative they will be accepted regardless of scientific rigor. Which opens up for further faulty research, inbred referencing and ultimately affecting societal insitiutions. Anyone who isn't sceptical of "soft sciences" at this point is an idiot. Hard sciences is bad enough.

Or it is gynocentric propaganda.
>I'm going to limit it to this specific type of rape
Fine. I'll limit assault to men being doused in gasoline and being burned to within an inch of their life.
>If that were the case I'd be scared
Same. If the studies are survey based/run by psychologists, I'm not going to take them seriously.
>There's a difference in severity between being punched and wallet taken vs raped.
I know. The punch results in real physical injury that can have lasting effects. The wallet being stolen results in a loss of actual material, often obtained by sacrificing time. You've lost not just what you possess, but the time it took you to collect it.

Having a mildly sore pussy for a day. Oh no.

I would much rather have a dick in my hole specifically designed to hold dick than have to undergo dental surgery and lose a weeks rent.

Yeah I wonder if pedophilia is really as damaging as people say it is too. I just don't get why having uncle todd bounce you on his lap a few times should be enough to ruin your life.

Attached: a53.jpg (737x758, 74.29K)

>Fine. I'll limit assault to men being doused in gasoline and being burned to within an inch of their life.
Meh, discussing all variations simultaneously is tedious and leads to many unnecessary misunderstandings. There's a reason why legal language is so clunky: Because it needs to be precise. If you wanna get salty because I want to avoid ambiguity so be it.
>If the studies are survey based/run by psychologists, I'm not going to take them seriously
It's a bold choice to discard psychology as a whole. None that I would share, but I guess that leaves nothing to discuss.

If everything that you disagree with is feminist propaganda and psychology is not real / trustworthy we have no common ground to argue.

>but I guess that leaves nothing to discuss.
So you're basically admitting that the effects of rape are largely subjective and not based on observable metrics, but rather the "muh feels" of women?

At least we're on the same page.

when pussy not wet dick hurt.

>but I guess that leaves nothing to discuss.
You can measure the physical damage or material loss of a crime.

It's really not rocket science.

>So you're basically admitting that the effects of rape are largely subjective and not based on observable metrics, but rather the "muh feels" of women?
Rape can cause injuries, and can also be coupled with physical assault

You seem to have a belief that sex is mostly physical and that it carries no emotional value, or that the emotional weight it has is minor compared to things like physical injury and money. So why can't you stop being obsessed with sex and women, and accept being a virgin? Or fix your depression in some way other than posting on R9K about how all you need is to have sex. Or maybe stop treating female virginity like some sacred symbol of purity if you suddenly change what sex means when trying to justify rape.

And 200 years ago we weren't able to measure radio waves. Does that mean they don't or didn't exist?