why do gay men seem to have identifiable traits?
>love drama
>lisp
>catty
>overly sexual
and you know it's not cultural because it's cross-cultures
this is a genuine question
>inb4 not all gays
>inb4 straight men have identifiable traits
if these are you arguments you aren't answering the question in good faith
>why do gay men seem to have identifiable traits?
>>inb4 not all gays
How would you identify one if you aren't willing to look at one that's different?
You might fibd that no one can argue with you because it's circular op
Men are shallow and cannot understand women. So just like trannies they become a caricature of what men think women behave like because it fulfils their creepy autogynephiliac fetish.
I want to know why they have accents
they fit in better with girl-cliques (usually the popular girls) so they pick up their mannerisms
not all gay guys are feminine though. but the feminine ones act that way because of high estrogen and also female socialization.
>no one can argue with you
that's the point. anyone who doesn't acknowledge that these are identifiable traits in gay men is simply avoiding the real question: why are they identifiable traits?
Fags are weirdly smug and have an over-inflated sense of self-importance, from the rich ones to the gutter gigolos. It comes from being male, associated with obvious bravado and piggishness- then combined with the perverted, coyish imitation of femininity they clown to attract their buttbuddies. They hate women, they hate us cuz they anus
no the thing that you're identifying as cross-cultural actually is cultural
that's the point
gay people are ousted by their native "cultures" so they established a "culture" that networks between them
all cultures are just dumb ways for NPCs to create an identity in lieu of self-actualizing for themselves so it's still retarded but it's how people operate for the most part
>why do gay men seem to have identifiable traits?
They don't. Some of them do and you identify those as gay while leaving the homo's who don't meet those traits in the straight column. This is sometimes called category bias.
>and you know it's not cultural because it's cross-cultures
Its not cross cultural, you just aren't exposed to other cultures. The gay stereotype in japan is people who spend to much time in the gym and don't talk much. There is no association with musical theatre, drama, or lisp.
The funniest thing is that most flamers you meet are actually straight. They hang out with all the girls and fuck most of them. those queeny theatre kids drown in pussy.
It's mercury poisoning.
Because they're the only ones you notice as "gay". The ones who are ordinary pass you by and you never know.
>inb4 not all gays
Saying "inb4" doesn't make it not true.
gay men i.e. the flamboyant ones, are basically women in male skin
you didn't actually answer the question. you're avoiding the real question: why are these identifiable traits?
you also didn't actually answer the question. the question: why are these identifiable traits?
Homosexuals have increased heavy metal deposits (bromine, mercury, alumnium, cadmium, calcified pineal gland) as a result of low iodine exposure and high fluoride exposure.
That's the reason why homosexuals only exist in cities.
I would assume there's some genetic and/or behavioral/cultural correlates
Kinda this, imagine how shit it must be to have such a small selection of possible mates, one reason why they do it is to make their gayness visible
what do you mean "its not cultural because its cross-cultural", you have to prove that that affect was independent/unique and not learned.
Hahaha, they're so gay!
>That's the reason why homosexuals only exist in cities.
I think such extraordinary claims require evidence