My parents wont believe the Jews are evil and run the world what do I do?

My parents wont believe the Jews are evil and run the world what do I do?

They just parrot shit back from their retarded news channel all day. They refuse to believe that Jews own the media, lie, the new world order, global banking, and shit like that

My parents just call it all stupid and then tell me what the news said. Why are boomers so god damn stupid? Yet the same time my dad complains about rich people acting like total jews but refuses to believe anything I say.

Attached: 213D6B7D-CB23-4528-8605-2C1EE96ACE85.jpg (976x850, 57.91K)

Your parents are probably mind controlled by the Zeta-Riticulan aliens that invaded the USA in the 1940s. They used the power lines to transmit Thanagarian brainwaves that override normal human thought.

You can block the brainwave devices with tin foil hats. Don't put hats on your parents though, because if the connection is broken the Men in Black will show up and wipe the area.

What you need to do is use Numerology to summon a sasquatch. Sasquatches are drawn to the number 22. So lay out 22 owl beaks in a circle and the sasquatch will enter the circle at 2200 hours (10 PM).

Let sasquatch penetrate you anally until he is sated and then beg him to restore your parent's brainwaves with his telepathic link. If all goes well, your parents will be free of the Jewish influence and be normal just like you.

I feel the same way about some things OP, like I tried telling my mum the news is a bunch of bullshit and it's the american government & NATO that are the real warmongerers, not Putin... And she got kind of aggressive with me and called me a lunatic and said putin is as bad as hitler. I tried pointing out the endless list of nations USA has invaded or installed dictators in and she told me to fuck off to my room. There are literally billions of people on earth right now, not even an exaggeration, who entirely get their opinions from their TV and newspapers, which in themselves are controlled elements by the respective governments of their nation. If you're a human being in the 21st century making your own mind up about things, you are in a small minority (well below 10% of the world population) and will almost always be ostracized if you speak out about your opinions. We live in a post-truth dystopia

Putin is not as bad as Hitler, but he's pretty war mongering himself.
Needless to say that the hegemonic empire in the last century, USA, is also, like any other empire under the sun, expansionist, warmongering and with little to no care for diplomacy when it comes to poor underdeveloped countries.
Just because you are right about somethings, doesn't mean you're right about everything.
If you think we live in some sort of conspiracy where you are one of the few enlightened beings who are free thinkers, you're actually just a dumb propagandized teenager.

Have you ever thought that maybe, just maybe, you were radicalized by internet propaganda and now you have a distorted view of reality?

Maybe you should send them Any Forums infographics and memes. Apparently they are hilarious and bAsEd and can rEdPiLL anyone. Once your parents see a jpeg of le happy merchant rubbing his hands while looking at nigger crime percentages they will finally be enlightened like you did.

Attached: efd8eda50ad4030dd0531958f9852d46.jpg (557x558, 33.64K)

Nobody is forcing Putin to act aggressive

>We live in a post-truth dystopia
except that implies there was a time of truth preceding this time. there was not. the truth has ALWAYS been repressed. so you can be pessimistic and assume that humans are incapable of facing the truth collectively, or you can be optimistic and frame it as living in a PRE-TRUTH society. I'm pessimistic but it's hard to dismiss the possibility of things eventually getting better. they get worse all the time so why shouldn't they also get better at some point?

>There are literally billions of people on earth right now, not even an exaggeration, who entirely get their opinions from their TV and newspapers
You speak like you get your opinions straight from the universal source of the greater truth.
The actual truth is that your source of opinions and information is as biased and skewed as any major news outlet.

yep, he could just let Americans isolate his country and bully him into doing whatever they want. why doesn't he just do that? why is he AGGRESSIVE? kek

>they get worse all the time
Not all the time. Our world has objectively more order, less chaos and less violence than the bronze age world
We have advanced, don't be a reactionary who's historically ignorant.
You could have literally been put to the fire 500 years ago for stating the earth revolved around the son (aka the truth)

Well yeah, he's the leader of a fragmented former power that thinks it still has any weight to throw around. The fact that he can't even regain territory that Russia held for centuries and developed from basically nothing should prove how much of a transparent temper tantrum his threats to invade are. He should let the big bad Americans tell him what to do because might makes right.

>he could just let Americans isolate his country
And do you honestly think that waging warfare will do any good to Russia or the world?
>Resolving our problems with violence
Medieval mindset.

Your speech is very misguided.
Putin should retreat but not because of American hegemony, and simply because imperialism leads to ruin.

>medieval

Violence is at the very core of human civilization and it is the only reason you can safely post retarded shit like this on the internet.

I actually agree with that. I didn't mean "all things get worse forever", I meant "some things". specifically I was thinking about the state of free expression. you can hardly deny that freedom of speech has taken a hit since the 90s. that's what "truth" is about first and foremost. you cannot have a society that values truth AND a society that suppresses speech. the elites have clearly chosen the latter now, in an overreaction to the internet. the internet has sped up the spread of information - information that was previously deemed PRACTICALLY suppressed without the need for an explicit law. now that any information can spread anywhere in no time the elites have lost a huge amount of control over what people know and believe, and their first reaction has been to try to make the internet shut up basically. they'd really prefer to silence the whole thing and go back to how things were in the 20th century. you could say and write whatever you wanted but it wouldn't spread because for that you'd need a big TV network or newspaper which conveniently only the elites had access to. so in practice only THEIR ideas really ever spread around the globe. as long as that was the case they didn't care what some "crazy person" somewhere had to say. they were okay with "conspiracy theorists" before the internet because they knew no such person or movement could threaten them as long as they just kept it off the TV and out of the newspapers.
that's the world they owned and they want it back, seemingly at any cost. the question is, will they ever change their minds and open the flow of information back up? will we live to see this? it would be depressing to be born in a time where freedom of speech seemed all but established and then live through a century where more and more freedoms are stripped and by the time we die it's like the internet never happened. can you imagine?

>Violence is at the very core of human civilization and it is the only reason you can safely post retarded shit like this on the internet.
Not really. Humanity's struggle to build civilization was always a struggle to leave violence and nature behind, and build a prosperous order of peace.
Throughout history, the peace inside one empire came at the expense of war in another land, and that still holds true today. A 1/3 of the world is at war. It's just not being fought in the wealthy countries's backyard.
Still, our world today is more peaceful than the world a thousand years ago, and humanity marches on towards the advancement of human rights, technology, and peace. Or, as we call it, the advancement of civilization

>And do you honestly think that waging warfare will do any good
ask the Americans who start a new war every other year and always have at least one war going on.

neck yourself nigger faggot

You're just repackaging whig history for a new generation. History is not a narrative and it isn't leading towards anything.

And you think America as a country benefits from those wars?
When they literally deplete the country's resources by trillions of dollars, all taxpayer money, cost thousands of American lives, and completely fail to achieve their imperialistic goals?

>you can hardly deny that freedom of speech has taken a hit since the 90s.
You're wrong, again. You do have freedom of speech.
You just want to be able to spurt hate speech without repercussions.
To that, I paraphrase Sartre:
>"Our freedom is defined by the fact that we must face the consequences of our actions"

I'm assuming you're not the same guy who is jerking off ITT about how America IS the imperialistic super power controlling everything and Russia should accept that? clearly the warmongering is helping *somebody* or it wouldn't keep happening every other year since WW2.
nobody said the wars have to help the American citizens so I don't get where you're going with that any way.

>clearly the warmongering is helping *somebody*
Yes, the people who make and sell guns and who lobby their will into the legislators by financing their political campaigns.
Still, even the very empire suffers heavily by waging war. It is only a very select few inside that country who actually benefit from the bloodbath.
Everyone else loses

>hate speech
if somebody sewed your lips shut you'd start writing a blog about how it's a good thing.

Attached: bootlickers.jpg (1018x1024, 106.61K)

>you cannot have a society that values truth AND a society that suppresses speech.
Yes, you can, because "truth" is not a concrete concept written in stone by the gods, and you conveniently have access to it.
The "truth" is multifaceted and heavily dependent on perspective.
Would you say that a person should be allowed, by merit of freedom of speech alone, to make a public speech in favor of pedophilia? Do you think that a person should have the right to go to a public place and hold pro pedophilia signs? Do you think that's right?
It seems like even you would have a limit