Do you agree with Blanchard's Transsexual Typology?

my name is kikomi and biotrans girls are valid and heckin cute

No I don't. I've interacted with a lot of Any Forums trannies and most of them don't seem to fall into either category. There are agp and hsts trannies to be sure, but it doesn't account for trannies as a whole.

I don't know about the validity or usefulness of the typology itself, but the charge against autogynephiles as being the less authentic trans type takes a lot of assumptions about AFAB sexuality for granted I think. Also, since there are a lot of autogynephiles who are not interested in living as women is proof that it is a tad more complicated than "I get boners when I am treated as a woman".

>afab sexuality
shut the fuck up. women don't get wet from wearing normal fucking clothing, you deranged perverted moid.

Why are the gay ones ALWAYS Brazilian or Thai?

>women don't get wet from wearing normal fucking clothing
Didn't say they did. But AFAB sexuality seems much closer to gynephilia/AGP/autosexuality than the HSTS's roaring allosexual boner for the male form. Blanchard assumes that the AFAB's sexuality is something akin to a homosexual males androphilia, which is why he talks about HSTS as if they are more legitimate. I think that is a mistake.

it's not strictly true in every case but it definitely mostly categorizes all trannies pretty well. AGP trannies tend to be more focused on feminine things like clothes, HSTS more focused on feminine actions like pleasing men, performing traditional feminine duties, etc

AGPs also tend to be more gifted. More involved in the introspection and theories about queer life. HSTS just want to suck dick and if wearing a dress helps them fulfill that cause then they will do it.

HSTS are better. more attractive and more likely to be mentally stable. AGP are almost all unstable nuts

>AFAB sexuality seems much closer to gynephilia/AGP/autosexuality t
Completely wrong. AGP only exists through the male perception. It is a sexual attraction to the *idea* of women, they have absolutely no clue about what being a woman actually entails. Women do not fetishize and sexualize their own womanhood, not even lesbians in this sense.
You are confusing the outward sexualization of women for social and material gains (in porn, fashion, social media, whatever) for the AGP feminization for their own sexual pleasure. The fact that you confused these two completely different things betrays your actual sex.
None of them are women, but HSTS are much closer.

pretty sure the difference is just that AGP are autists/introverts and HSTS are extroverted, more active socially

Accurate. HSTS are the lesser evil by far, in fact I kind of don't mind them being around since they acknowledge that they aren't real women, they don't attempt to play the victim card or corrode hobbies and institutions. They are content with being the fun little novelty they are, more of a doll than a human being and it's okay because that's what they want you to see them as. They still gross me out on a sexual level.

Another categorization is the emasculated male. Not homosexual or autogynephilic (at least when they started out), just troons out as a way to cope with their undesirability and the realities of the subpar male life. This one is becoming increasingly more common and they are the only ones that can and should be saved.