>covid happens in early 2020, prompting a strong reaction from all governments across the world to find a cure, even if it means pushing out an emergency use authorization vax in a fraction of the time vaccines are traditionally developed
>government fires doctors for prescribing Ivermectin in the states, due to alleged "risks", despite presenting a rushed vaccine with much more intrinsic risk, as any new medicine has, as the sole cure
>despite the fact that Ivermectin was proven to be effective at both treating and preventing covid
>entire astroturfed media/shill campaign against it, lampooning it as "horse dewormer", because a handful of people resorted to the livestock version, because it wasn't being prescribed for covid
>death toll that's constantly paraded around by ideological power trippers could have been much lower if Ivermectin was actually being offered as a treatment, which is why it wasn't
>this study from mid 2021 proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Ivermectin is effective at reducing deaths and hospitalizations, yet this isn't common knowledge because of the deluge of censorship and true misinformation on part of the powers that be for the past 2 years has drowned out any unbiased information that didn't go in lockstep with their propaganda
(1/2)
Lmaoing @ your life if you took the jab
Other urls found in this thread:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
youtube.com
twitter.com
(2/2)
>(you are here)
LMAOing @ your brain if you took the vaccine, you absolute fucking moron. You braindead peon. You literally trusted a cabal of evil 1%ers with your life and these same people suppressed life saving medicine to further their agenda. What makes you think they value your life enough to thoroughly vet your vaccine when they let hundreds of thousands due to the blatant suppression of Ivermectin? Good luck with the rest of your life, buddy! And don't expect any sympathy either, should you develop horrible side effects later down the line. We warned you and you tried to ban us from society, deriding us as insane conspiracy theorists. You made your beds, lie in them.
Here's the link btw, if you reply to this thread without reading the conclusion I'm going to assume you're a brainlet that doesn't know how to skim studies, which would make sense if you jabbed yourself.
Triple jabbed here, its scary how I went to get it three times without even thinking about it.
>Pro vaxxers
HA! Good luck when you catch the coof and die you fucking retard LMAO im so much better than you
>Anit vaxxers
HA! Good luck when you catch some crazy disease and die you fucking retard LMAO im so much better than you
what where you thinking man, they don't even provide compensation for injuries! pfizer, moderna, etc., all these corporations are evil to the core and have tried to worm their way out of payouts despite acknowledging that certain batches of medicine have been incredibly harmful, I believe pfizer once pushed out a heart medicine that later turned out to be carcinogenic, not to mention J&J trying to get out of compensating victims of their ASBESTOS BABY POWDER. and now they have a free pass from the government to turn away any injured vaxxoids. I hope you learned from your mistake at least, these people aren't to be trusted ever.
idk man I wouldn't feel comfortable knowing I took pfizer mystery juice given their track record
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
"Ivermectin has become a controversial potential medicine for coronavirus disease 2019. Some early studies suggested clinical benefits in treatment of infection. However, the body of evidence includes studies of varying quality. Furthermore, some trials have now been identified as potentially fraudulent."
Indeed, the study that showed the greatest degree of efficacy was shown to have been entirely made-up.
>>death toll that's constantly paraded around by ideological power trippers could have been much lower if Ivermectin was actually being offered as a treatment, which is why it wasn't
You don't think that states and the scientific community wanted to lower death rates? Then why lockdowns, masks, vaccines, and all of the rest?
>nuh uh you're study is biased my totally unbiased study said so!
lol, lmao.
remind me which medicine has an expired patent with no real way of financially aiding the elite, and which vaccine producers are partially owned by members of congress via stocks?
>>nuh uh you're study is biased my totally unbiased study said so!
There are many other studies which reached the same conclusion as mine regarding your study. I didn't find any favouring yours.
>remind me which medicine has an expired patent with no real way of financially aiding the elite, and which vaccine producers are partially owned by members of congress via stocks?
How is that relevant to the efficacy of the different treatments? Economics can't explain biomedical science.
In the UK we have reasonably high levels of vaccination, and we now have scrapped literally every single restriction that was introduced for covid. Life has returned to normal because vaccines mean that we no longer have over a thousand people dying every day from covid.
You do want life to return to normal, don't you?
One final thing. Even if ivermectin works, which it very much seems like it doesn't, then we have lots of other drugs that have already been developed for use against covid. They definitely do work. So who cares whether or not ivermectin may have worked to some degree?
>There are many other studies which reached the same conclusion as mine regarding your study. I didn't find any favouring yours.
You realize google actively suppresses studies that go against their narrative, right? I had to find the one I linked on duckduckgo, despite it being on the same website as yours
>>remind me which medicine has an expired patent with no real way of financially aiding the elite, and which vaccine producers are partially owned by members of congress via stocks?
>How is that relevant to the efficacy of the different treatments? Economics can't explain biomedical science.
really man? are you being disingenuous or are you just dense? it's relevant because it represents a conflict of interest, thus damaging the credibility of any of the studies claiming to "debooonk' the pro ivermectin studies
>In the UK we have reasonably high levels of vaccination, and we now have scrapped literally every single restriction that was introduced for covid. Life has returned to normal because vaccines mean that we no longer have over a thousand people dying every day from covid.
Sweden had very few restrictions to begin with, restrictions are lifted and reimplemented constantly in other countries, in arbitrary patterns, completely unrelated to begin with. Canada, for example, recently lifted their vaccine passports claiming that "covid isn't an issue anymore" after a bunch of truckers organized to protest the mandates. Going by what the government does doesn't help your argument at all.>You do want life to return to normal, don't you?
Kill yourself.
It's easy to walk through life with your nose in the air and scoff at the NPCs who took the vaccine when you're healthy and it's just the flu to you.
I had the flu in February 2020 and ended up in the ER and received supplemental oxygen support.
>One final thing. Even if ivermectin works, which it very much seems like it doesn't, then we have lots of other drugs that have already been developed for use against covid. They definitely do work. So who cares whether or not ivermectin may have worked to some degree?
That's why Ivermectin was suppressed, Pfizer for example is working on a pill to treat covid, which would bring in a ton of revenue for them. The only other drug they commonly use to treat covid is Remdesivir, which has it's own problems, namely being hell on your kidneys. It seems like the only medicine they want to use either enriches the elite or damages your body, thus making it more likely you end up as a covid death, strengthening the narrative even further. There have already been covid deaths attributed to kidney failure, so it isn't far off the assume that drugs like Remdesivir could be making matters exponentially worse.
That's why I said Ivermectin should have been used for treatment and prevention. Instead of using your unhealthy lifestyle to promote fearmongering, why don't you read the first study I linked. It's not like there was even a vaccine to save you in early 2020 to begin with, but they did have Ivermectin, which has been used as an anti viral in the past. The fact that this wasn't the first line of defense is criminal, especially if this whole thing justified rushing a vaccine, which is far more dangerous than using a medicine that's been applied successfully for decades.
>You realize google actively suppresses studies that go against their narrative, right?
Do you have evidence that ivermectin not working is the policy of Google?
>it's relevant because it represents a conflict of interest, thus damaging the credibility of any of the studies claiming to "debooonk' the pro ivermectin studies
How is Congress relevant to scientific studies? You are talking about two entirely different groups of people. There is literally no conflict of interest, unless members of Congress have been doing these studies themselves.
>Sweden had very few restrictions to begin with
Sweden deaths per million 1,625.21
Norway 289.46
Denmark 709.63
Finland 406.14
We all hate restrictions, but done properly they were necessary until vaccines and covid treating drugs were produced. Now, thanks to the vaccine, covid is behind us. Covid only remains an issue in countries with low vaccine takeup, which tends only to be poor countries or those with low educational levels.
>Canada, for example, recently lifted their vaccine passports claiming that "covid isn't an issue anymore" after a bunch of truckers organized to protest the mandates.
Good. Let's get back to normal and put this mess behind us.
>Pfizer for example is working on a pill to treat covid, which would bring in a ton of revenue for them.
Yes, we should nationalise big pharma. It's great to see another Bernie bro on the boards.
>It seems like the only medicine they want to use either enriches the elite or damages your body
Sadly, that is the nature of big pharma. they're extremely capable of producing good medicine quickly, but unfortunately they make a profit in what should never be a profit making area. It's so refreshing to see a fellow socialist here.
>>Pfizer for example is working on a pill to treat covid, which would bring in a ton of revenue for them.
>Yes, we should nationalise big pharma. It's great to see another Bernie bro on the boards.
no thanks, you can keep your anti white, hate spewing kike of a failed candidate dude lmao
youtube.com
imagine if the races were reversed, if it was a white man saying that Jews don't know what it's like to be poor. not only would it more accurately reflect reality, considering half of the top 1% of the U.S. is Jewish, but the person saying it would be crucified. Have fun simping for a rich Jew who despises you though
My bad, I didn't realize I was speaking to a television. Go spew your inorganic catchphrases somewhere else
I win, thank you for participating. I shall continue to campaign for your freedom from want and ignorance, 'though you may hate me for doing so.
>I win, thank you for participting. I shall continue to campaign for your freedom from want and ignorance, though you may hate me for doing so.
Idk if even ivermectin is necessary for most people. My alcoholic chain smoking mom had covid (probably omicron) and all she had was a blocked nose. I didn't even catch it, or if I did it was asymtopmatic. What a fucking sham really.
NOOO don't redistribute power and wealth to me and my loved ones!! You said mean things about white people once uwu
Identity politics is for fools. This is why you will always be stupid and poor.
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This shows that there was moderate evidence for reducing the risk of death using ivermectin. At best we're looking at a 50% reduction in mortality by using ivermectin. The vaccine by comparison has a far greater effectiveness.
It's like people can't hold nuanced opinions anymore.