Apparently this is better than the average man in terms of swipes to matches.
Apparently this is better than the average man in terms of swipes to matches
does this work if you deleted and remade your tinder like 4 times like I did?
Don't think so
btw i don't have the file but the average man apparently matched on 2.4% of those he swiped right on, I matched with 3.6% or something. So I'm a brad but I'm self sabotaging like a boss because trauma
>tfw
how the fuk do you have 500 matches and no dates? I had like 70 matches and I got 14 dates out of it.
2327 matches
because I'm Jerry seinfeld level picky and am a narcissist and have asperger, etc.
>On Tinder for 5+ years
Bro just stop. I used Tinder for 3 months and fucked 5 women.
I wear suits in my profile pic, pics of me at the gym, and tell whores I'm starting an electric business.
What are you doing that I'm not anime nigger?
(that posts not OP)
>What are you doing that I'm not anime nigger?
All of my photos were shitty selfies and I had a cringe nerdy bio.
He's good looking, it's literally that simple
>2327 matches
>1740 no chats
Who are all these people that dont respond? It can't be an inactive account if you're matching with them.
I didn't bother messaging most of my matches because I mainly use the app for validation, and the idea of meeting a random stranger with romantic intent is just weird to me.
>girl matches with 300 guys
>270 of them message her
>ignores 150 ugliest ones
No, it counts those that don't respond as "chats", the 1740 no chats neither one of us messaged eachother
Definitely better than a 0.5% rate.
Also, this guy almost hit 60K in four months.
Women flake very often. I have scheduled more than a dozen dates that women flaked out of at the last moment. I have only met two women from Tinder, one of whom photoshopped her lazy eye and obesity out of her pictures and the other had such bad oral health that she had blackish green plaque on all of her teeth.
Yeah! Exactly! I'm doing better than the average tinder man according to all the stats I look at. I'm not given enough credit on here baka.
It would change the interpretation a lot if it made separate categories for people that don't respond to your messages, people that messaged first, people that you didn't respond to, etc. Out of those 587 "chats" how many did you actually have a conversation with?
I would also like to know where these guys live, how far they set their radius and how high they set the age limit. 92k and 60k is insane to me. NYC has about 2.5 million people between the ages of 18-35. We'll cut that in half and say 1.25 million women. How many of them are on tinder?
OP here, I live in rural new england ser
Maybe like 20 or 30 I attempted actual conversation I think. Only a few stand out in my mind.
same here man, i must have negative game.