The soIution

the soIution

Attached: 4d56afdb45431cbebe22cfd1230da547[1].jpg (1700x2000, 1.27M)

please post follow-up

follow-up

Attached: 9d652409b7158a8447dde24e62fae72a[1].jpg (1700x2000, 1.25M)

>killing
>not torture, beating, stockholme syndrome

the only killing id enjoy is a world wide apocalypse

Sure, let's make a limited supply even more limited, that will surely fix the demand.

What if people don't care about the market anymore and they just want revenge?

Attached: floppa.jpg (1080x722, 196.79K)

>sparks came out of her vagina
is she a synth?

it's literally piss

Then those people are brainlets. Taking revenge has never solved anything ever.

Not anyone in this thread, but killing someone who's done something bad prevents him from doing the bad thing again
That's the point of revenge and that's why there's a human instinct to seek revenge when you're wronged

it's not about revenge, it's about sending a message.

Like I said, what if they don't want solutions anymore, only satisfaction?

You know people shit and piss themselves when they die, right?

That is not revenge. That is prevention. Revenge has nothing to do with prevention, it is an action solely done for personal emotional satisfaction. You should strive for the former and not the latter. Sometimes they overlap but often not.

Then why did OP say "the solution"?

>durr hurr taking revenge isn't revenge
Even chimps take revenge on each other
If you successfully obliterate the opposing side after it wrongs you then you have removed the threat of it happening again, regardless of what petty shit sets it off. That's why it's instinctual to want to fight someone after they disrespect you. Your primal brain knows that it's an attack on your resource provision and mating and you get ready to fight.
"prevention" is not a thing that exists, no caveman was clubbing the other caveman in the face with the idea of prophylactic surgery in his head

Attached: 1632656776898.png (350x535, 319.1K)

>If you successfully obliterate the opposing side after it wrongs you
Not all revenge has to delete people. If you have to delete people in order for your revenge to work then it wasn't the revenge that removed the threat it was just deleting them.
Am i legit explaining this? Are you a literal chimp?

Exactly: taking revenge is what primitive animals do. But we are humans, gifted with rational reasoning abilities. Let's use it.
Evolution does not optimize for happiness. We need to ignore our primal urges and think about what optimizes happiness instead, and that is not revenge.

>we are le humans, magical beings
We are ignorant primates trapped in our primitive evolutionary psychology and I'm sick of fedorafags insisting that we're anything more than that because we can play dominos and order pizza and download internet porn.
You might be able to ignore, or delude yourself into thinking you've ignored, your primitive psychology, but good luck on your hermitage from now on because no one is joining you.

Yes, we know. Not all retaliation over being wronged is to the same degree, but the underlining instinct that causes retaliation of any degree in the first place is one that seeks to eliminate the other after the other wrongs you. It was productive to do this in primitive times. If it wasn't productive then it wouldn't have lingered in our evolutionary psychology. Nice talking to you, dumb low IQ nigger.

If no one is joining me in not being a complete retard, then so be it.

People join you in spirit, of course, sparsely throughout the world wherever someone with enough time to think he's risen above the system spawns.