Post lifts that are fit for a true revolutionary
Post lifts that are fit for a true revolutionary
Cable neck-ups you shite
british billionaire money curls to pocket x F
Dick sucking 4xfailure. Commes=fruits, kys.
cope
Squats
The bourgeois skip leg day but the worker lifts himself and his comrades every day to build a better world
You're all weak incels. Imagine unironically shilling for capitalism lmao.
Now get to bed, sheckleberg needs you at work early tomorrow
Good analogy, legmaxxing is the way
Im sure of it nazi fuck
>share weights with a community of weight lifters regularly
>the default stage of weight lifters isn't communism
Farmer's walk, obviously.
Yes, it's capitalism or communism, nothing are else.
Correct. Any form of economic management ends up at one or the other.
Haha.
I assume most communists are role-playing Americans who just want an functional mixed economy like everyone else (sorta) has. The Nordic model and all that.
Although I'm sure that some form of true socialism would be preferable to what we have now, perhaps not necessarily Marxist-Leninism, but, you know, something vaguer, with lots of geodesic domes and floating furniture.
I'm also sure that it will be produced by largely market driven mixed economies rather than political upheaval.
What can I say, I'm an insufferable optimist.
definitely not shilling for capitalism, but i am from an ex-USSR country and wanted to tell you a fun historical fact about european magnates funding the counter-elite revolution of 1917
You clearly have no business discussing these things.
The fact that I don't know whether you're referring to communism or a command economy speaks volumes on its own. Directly contradicting your point and showing how inadequate your post was towards the end if communicating anything meaningful.
yes literal moron
collective or individual
there's no third
Sent from iPhone 14 loool
>>share weights with a community of weight lifters regularly
capitalist sisters...
Communism describes something specific and maybe inhuman, no, not in the sense that "muh Marx killed millions" but in the sense that a cashless society might not work, what Marx didn't know, that we now do, is that humans have been keeping track of finances for 20,000+ years.
Collectivism is much broader. You can have a collectivist society that is very right wing, in fact. You might have heard of this before.
No one sould have more muscles thab others
hey Chads, gib gains
And also: Communism doesn't have to be collectivist, all it has to be is cashless, classless, and propertyless, the road to communism would appear to require collectivism on some level, but once it's achieved there's, at least in theory, no upper class to enforce any kind of solidarity.