Is it harder to escape being a skelly or a fatass relatively?

Is it harder to escape being a skelly or a fatass relatively?

Attached: skelly.jpg (2100x1575, 418.71K)

it is harder to escape your mom's gorilla grip pussy

Skelly trying to gain lean muscle mass is harder and more expensive, all fat people have to do is literally put down the fucking fork and hit the treadmill.

Harder to escape being a skelly
Pic related is my progress at 195cm (6 foot 5)
5 years in-between both pictures

Attached: progress.jpg (724x724, 39.73K)

lmao how is it more expensive,
all you have to do is pick up the fucking fork, fats have to lose weight and then build muscle once they're a walking skin flap.

>lmao how is it more expensive

>>>all you have to do is pick up the fucking fork

Depends on height.
For tall people being a fatass is an easier starting point
For short people being a skelly is better.
Skelly tall people will probably never put on mass
Fat short people will probably be fat forever even if they put on mass

You dont look bad but fuck, you either did something wrong along the way or there is no hope.

No offense byt this is atypical

Losing weight aka not eating takes no physical effort compared to eating

bro you do realize a fat will be eating the same food right after they lose weight, you're not retarded right?

I lifted inconsistently for the first 3 years, couldn't even do one pushup when I first started (15 years old at before pic)
Being tall also made it harder

Shut the fuck up not even fat here 73kgs 173cms
But Im cutting and Im suffering so bad ,God I wanna eat aaaaaaaah.

think you're out of your mind bud, hunger pain from being obese is insane, it's also an addiction and taken me years to get lean from obesity 12 years ago, my natural state wants to eat 3500 calories, if I don't watch it eat whole foods I'll gain like 20 pounds.

You do progressive overload?

Escape skelly mode, 100x times harder.

kill yourself

Probably "easier" to drop weight, as others have said "just stop eating". However as for actually looking aesthetic, being fat enough will leave you with the loose skin and stretchmarks which can only be removed via surgery and leaves those obvious scars.

5 years of lifting? You've got a good foundation, user, but 5 years should take you further than that. Curious what your lifting routine and diet was during the period of time.

Unless you were actually obese, you can typically outgrow the extra skin with ample muscle. I was 200 pounds when I was 14, then I went down to 130 by 16, then I went back up to 170 by 25 but with muscle. Not gonna post my gains because I have enough self esteem issues leftover from childhood, but trust me when I say it isn't noticeable unless I've skipped lifting for several days and eat an entire Thanksgiving dinner.

it's hard af if you have a high ass metabolism. but nothing some mass-gainer and hard work and dedication can't fix. just picture where you would be 6 months from now if you started working out 6/7 days a week. get it done, user.

Losing weight is a passive endeavour, gaining muscle an active one.
I can see slimming down being harder than muscling up for a certain type of character, but for 95% of people dieting is easier than exercising imo.

Probably about the same difficulty. They're just different challenges.
>t. skelly to fatty to fit over 2.5yrs.

Fatties have more muscle by default so 9/10 times a better starting point also you can lose weight faster then gain lean muscle mass. Also eating costs money not eating doesn't cost anything.

/Thread

Attached: 80A0D8CC-3FEB-429A-84F5-57020A0AD02C.jpg (758x398, 40.03K)

Correct answer. Only bad thing about starting fat is you have to juggle eating enough for gains tax with losing weight, but you definitely start from a better base and don't have problems eating.

Majority of the population is obese and being thin is actually praiseworthy.

what the fuck do you think