/fat/ - sugar is broccoli if you measure it

>Who is /fat/ for?
For glucose guzzlers who are working towards a better physique through meaningful hard-work, strategy, and dedication.This is not QTDDTOT, stick to questions on fat loss. Post height and weight when asking for advice.
Join our Fatty Contest: fattycontest.com/

>What do I do first?
1. Read physiqonomics.com/fat-loss/
2. Calculate your Body Fat Percentage: fitness.bizcalcs.com/Calculator.asp?Calc=Body-Fat-Navy
3. Calculate your TDEE: sailrabbit.com/bmr/
Remember to use bodyfat% and use Katch-McArdle Formula with sedentary settings or your TDEE will be too high.
4. Plan your weight loss: losertown.org/eats/cal.php
5. Track your nutrition with MyFitnessPal (better for packaged food), Cronometer (better for generic food/macros) or LoseIt (great for both).

>Now what?
Count calories, all of them.
Eat about 500-1000 less calories than your TDEE.
Buy scales, be accurate.
Learn to cook. Try to stick to lean protein and green vegetables.
Eat a lot of protein. 1g per lb of goal lean body mass.
Doing cardio, even just walking, will improve your health. There is no such thing as a healthy fat heart, but you can offset the risks.
Lifting weights will keep and gain muscle mass and burn fat much quicker. No lifting results in the body burning away muscle AND fat.
Drink more water.
Read the Any Forums sticky: liamrosen.com/fitness.html

>DON'T
Eat refined sugars, they're terrible for you regardless of calories.
Eat processed foods.
Drink your calories (alcohol, soda, starbucks).
Freak out over a weight loss stall. Plateaus can last up to three weeks.
"Reward" yourself. Cheat days cheat only yourself.
Be a retard.

>Other resources:
Loose skin, gyno & stretch marks: weight-loss-side-effects.netlify.app/ .
Reddit wiki: reddit.com/r/loseit/wiki/faq

Prev thread:

Attached: 1602526243943.jpg (1280x1772, 327.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28074888/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17130851/
biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/403931v3
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

first for fuck Putin

bros... I finally found cheap bulk 6% plain greek yogurt. This tastes amazing compared to the cheap 0% I've always been buying

>Isn't that guy literally retarded and just reads studies like a zombie?
Considering several big names in the industry like Stan Efferding and Mark Bell have endorsed him and his online health clinic, no, not retarded at all.
What all 3 of these have in common? They all actually lift, unlike ledditor ketards

>What all 3 of these have in common?
They're roidtrannies?

They endorse him because he's a drug dealer.

>Appeal to authority fallacy
>NGMI
My sources>Your "sources" (cherrypicked studies/literal Reddit screenshots)
Not an argument
>implying accomplished powerlifters have to simp for PEDs
Open your syruphole, I'm going to stick my dick in it.

Are you telling me if I actually eat 500 cals less than my TDEE and do an hour or so of cardio daily, weight loss is guaranteed?

>syruphole
I'm a ketolard. I don't have a syruphole.

That's right user. It's the healthiest way to lose weight. You're not allowed to take shortcuts that would get you to your goal in a quarter of the time. That would be unhealthy and you will yo-yo because I said so-so.

Attached: fasting times.png (1325x1034, 121.53K)

If you consume any amount below your TDEE, weight loss occurs. Over time, consistently consuming fewer calories than you burn will result in the reduction of body fat.

You act like a Canadian so you do have a syruphole, maplenigger

According to the sugar industry it's a law of the universe!

Attached: 1602531224664.jpg (1280x1744, 381.82K)

Whelp looks like the science is settled.

Shut up racist chud. Fried chicken and waffles are part of a well balanced breakfast.
If you don't eat cornsyrup flakes, you're metabolism will tank and you won't burn any calories for the whole day.

Ngl this shit is the bomb. Always thought it tasted like shit compared to regular soda but I can honestly barely tell the difference.

I drink 2-4 Liters every day and it completely eliminated all of my sugar cravings. It also helps me drink at least 2 L of liquid a day

Attached: 9242351070_c0773ed489_b.jpg (733x1024, 212.89K)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28074888/
CICO got nothing to do with sugar industry, and carb-insulin model is flawed

>kevin hall
He's been thoroughly BTFO by David Ludwig in the past few years.

Metabolic advantage of low-carb is confirmed. Fat people get +500kcal/day metabolic boost from low-carb.

Cellular respiration is also higher in fat tissue during low-carb, confirmed in humans. Ben Bikman will be on a podcast soon to talk about it. I can post it here when it happens if you want.

I lose water weight from fasting and I noticed I don't sweat as much. Or that I don't need to sweat as much, when I exert myself.

>Cellular respiration is also higher in fat tissue during low-carb
I think it might be because blood flows more to fatty tissue due to hormones and receptors fuckery, unless someone is memeing me.

Why are so many members of Portland Antifa overweight and obese?

If carb-insulin model worked it would be able to predict weight gain. prediction is a key element of a scientific model
Yet it does a horrible job at prediction
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17130851/

also david ludwig is a joke. only way he managed to say sugar causes NFALD is by heavily cherry picking data. no wonder he gets so much critizicm

ment Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

5'9" 175 lbs morbidly obese fuck here, I finally started eating only 3 very low calorie meals a day and doing vigorous cardio, I won't stop until I weigh 137 lbs

>Outstanding questions are raised and new directions for future prospective studies are proposed in order to improve our understanding of the role of biological determinants of energy balance and development of obesity in humans.
tl;dr
>We did a study that says we need to do more studies.

heres the critique of that study that claims the energy increase
-Omitting metabolic chamber data when doubly labeled water (DLW) data available. Metabolic chamber is the gold standard for energy expenditure and a DIRECT measurement and DLW is merely a surrogate... so why would Ludwig choose to use DLW when a direct measurement was available? This would be like using skinfold data instead of MRI measurement of body fat even when both were available!

Using DLW data biases the long term studies towards low carb superiority as DLW has NOT been validated for energy expenditure measurements during low carb diets. This is likely due to the change in respiratory quotient (RQ) (ratio of O2/CO2) during low carb diets which causes greater than predicted increase in CO2. Since RQ is used in the calculation to determine energy expenditure from DLW, this causes an overestimation of energy expenditure when using DLW for low carb diet studies. Additionally, the increased loss of body water from low carb diets also exacerbates this overestimation. This is likely why ONLY studies using DLW have shown significant increases in EE, whereas metabolic chamber studies have failed to show the same outcomes.
-Layne Norton

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/403931v3

>every study I don't like uses inferior methods to fudge the numbers
>except every study that I like
*yawn*