>World Title
>Midcard Title
>Tag Team Title
>Trio Title
>no women division
ITT: Ideal number of belts for a wrestling fed
Oliver Taylor
Nicholas Ortiz
Drop this trio bullshit
Lincoln Robinson
>3x3 traiangle gate champion
Jackson Morris
Lmao fuck trios matches (some exceptions may apply)
Austin Myers
Huh what do you mean exactly?
Wyatt Brown
No trios matches but add 1 more midcard title
Dominic Collins
Trio always sucks shit.
Adrian Turner
All indies need is a world, a midcard, and a tag team for belts. Maybe a midcard gimmick belt like hard-core or cruiserweight.
Christian Gray
I never understood why two midcard belts are needed in a promotion. One belt makes the job just fine.
Tyler Wilson
I like belts user. And when the two midcards wrestle it makes a spectacle
Brandon Diaz
I agree
Camden Parker
This
Joshua Jones
>trio title
Fuck no
Replace it with an undercard title, it gives some more prestige to the midcard belt and gives the undercard jobbers some reason to exist
Jonathan Cruz
I like that one user's idea of an openweight belt as the top title, heavyweight and jr heavyweight belts as the midcard titles, and then openweight tag and trios belts. Maybe even add a women's belt.
Hudson Russell
Women can only draw sex appeal user
Asher Butler
>World Title
>Midcard Title
>Tag Titles
>Gimmick Title (applies to Womens Title)
Juan Barnes
what about a tv title?
Ryder Roberts
No arguments from me on this
Austin Gonzalez
>ideal number of belts for a wrestling fed
>World Title
>Hardcore Title
that's it
Dylan Ramirez
>Heavyweight Championship
>Tag Team Championships
>Intercontinental Championship
>Cruiserweight Championship
>Hardcore Championship
Michael Cox
Replace trios with Jr titles
Cooper Johnson
>world championship
>upper midcard championship
>low card championship
>tag team championship
literally all you need.