Jim Ryan thinks PlayStation will be at a loss without Call of Duty he also goes on to state how Phil Spencer’s...

Jim Ryan thinks PlayStation will be at a loss without Call of Duty he also goes on to state how Phil Spencer’s promise to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation 3 more years after existing contracts expire is still unfair. Basically Jim Ryan is saying PlayStation will be worthless if the Microsoft Activision deal goes through


ign.com/articles/playstations-jim-ryan-calls-xboxs-call-of-duty-promise-inadequate-on-many-levels?amp=1

Attached: 7A648031-581A-4A03-B7A0-72BB87439ADA.jpg (400x400, 21.41K)

Xbox survived Xbox One era, Nintendo survived Wii U era, why snoystation cant survive? Is Jim Ryan telling us snoys never cared about shitstation games?

Attached: 602332db435b4.jpg (992x671, 207.76K)

Sony Jabronies, I'm thinking we won.

Attached: SH2 remake.png (2048x1035, 1.7M)

Jim Ryan basically pulled a Bernie Stolar by saying the PlayStation platform is at a loss without cod he’s basically saying to his consumer base that a multiplatform game is what made ps a great platform and not the exclusives

>Jim Ryan thinks PlayStation will be at a loss without Call of Duty and only Call of Duty
???

Attached: Team Victory Poses.png (1774x744, 1.88M)

They have bungie. They just need to turn Destiny into a yearly release like COD.

its all a ruse. snoy is going full live service with bungie among others. if you want to worry about anything with snoy worry about them sinking 1 billion dollars into the metaverse and pursuing it as a real market segment.

>They have bungie.
Do they? My understanding is they paid 3 and a half billion to "own" Bungie but not actually control them. I think Bungie can still put their games on Xbox.

Normies love Call of Duty. Normies are fed up with Battlefield. Normies wouldn't even touch Destiny in 2022. Console sales are determined by Normies. If no Normies are interested in your console, it becomes as irrelevant as a Switch.

who the hell still plays fps, there hasn't been a good one since quake 3 arena.

Why does Sony think they have the right to demand a third party company release games on their platform?

No way. That would be a huge waste of money if they can't even get an exclusive out of it.

>be a greedy cunt and hoard a bunch of games as exclusives
>suddenly piss your pants when it happens to you
what goes around comes around

Of course they own Bungie you fucking idiot, the whole "we're still letting them do what they want" is PR speech like how literally every single company EA bought said they would still be autonomous just with more cash right before falling in line with EA's policies.

They don't have any right, but they think if they can get the public riled up enough, it might hurt their opponents (and subsequently keep it on their console generating them money for nothing)

>Do they? My understanding is they paid 3 and a half billion to "own" Bungie but not actually control them.

are you fucking retarded? i feel like zoomers are not good at critical thinking

>third party
The problem is that it won't be anymore.

ps3 era sony was in a fucking terrible spot too. all that happens when one of these companies flounders is that they do something based to catch up. wii u flops? good exclusives and they bring all the ecchi vita games to the switch. xbone flops? $1 game pass, please buy our console. ps3 flops? dirt cheap super slims and good exclusives.

the worst spot for a company to be in, if you're a consumer, is #1 because that's when they go fucking retarded like microsoft during the 360->xbox period. or nintendo during the wii->wii u period. or sony with the ps4->ps5 period. microsoft buying call of duty is the best thing that can happen if you're a snoy unless you care about call of duty like a faggot, because it means sony will have to try instead of censoring everything and coasting off the ps4.

Every article on the subject mentions Bungie being able to put games on whatever platform they want with quotes, not just vague promises that nothing will change in their culture.

>But I read it!

not getting the point about critical thinking.

Reminder that its been leaked that Sony is buying Square.

sony and square linked up?

doubt they have the money to. wouldn't be meaningful at all even if they do. can't think of a more fallen from grace company

If they own Dragon Quest they win Japan.

>Nintendo survived Wii U era
Because of 3DS

>Xbox survived Xbox One era
Because of M$'s infinite pockets.

Sony does NOT has a backup plan.

What would be the point? Final Fantasy? They're already money-hatting it. Western IPs? Gone.

>SE
>Owning DQ
Dumbass.

Sony needs the CoD money to fund their AAAAA movies

japan doesn't even play real video games anymore dude. tiny market, and not that relevant of one. literal india is like 10x more important now.