About to start Dark Souls II: Scholar of the First Sin on Xbox 360. What am I in for?

About to start Dark Souls II: Scholar of the First Sin on Xbox 360. What am I in for?

Attached: 91a0LiC6rtL._SL1500_.jpg (1063x1500, 263.03K)

Other urls found in this thread:

darksouls2.wikidot.com/game-patches
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Actual trash. Enjoy.

open the game and find out retard

One of the worst gaming experiences of all time.

Attached: irony made manifest.png (333x268, 104.31K)

kino

Garbage that only contrarians like

It's the vanilla game with just the dlc. It's not scholar.

the original pleb filter & an amazing experience (if you're willing to git gud and level ADP to 20)

leveling adp is for scrubs.

Its my favorite game of all time.

Subhuman framerates

Be warned it's not actually scholar. SotFS is amazing but this aint it.

Movement controls that feel straight out of a ps1 game and the most blatant enemy spam you’ve ever seen. Some of the dlc stuff is alright though.

level up adp , that you're priority get it to sub 30 to have any meaningful dodging
it's a good game but the worst of the trilogy

also preferably , you play it on your pc with mods to fix the omnidirectional movement

What happened to the 360 version? I played Sotfs on series X.

360 and ps3 are just vanilla ds2+dlc rebranded as Scholar.

>level up adp , that you're priority get it to sub 30 to have any meaningful dodging
The game is better when you dont level adp. And im tired of people saying this. You dodge better by lowering your equip load.

Wild. I can't help but feel most people hate this game because their experience of it is stuck in the PS3/360 era. No wonder.

There are two SotFS, one is 32 bit with all DLC included, the other is the 64bit with gaemplay/enemy placement changes & all DLC.
The 32bit is for PS3/Xbox360 and the 64bit is for PS4/XboxOne. Similar for PC except 32 bit is called Vanilla event hough the credits claim it is SotFS.
Aldia might fit in but it doesn;t matter.

DS3 is almost as shit as this game

Vanilla is superior anyway

unfiltred kino and looks like ds3trannies are already here

That's exactly what is. You can have people arguing with one another having had two different experiences. I played both concurrently having really liked Scholar as sort of an experiment, and vanilla is bad. The lighting is broken, the enemy placement seems less fair and bloated, and there seems to be heavier tracking and just more jank fighting the enemies in vanilla than there is in scholar. There's also some scripting, enemy behavior changes, and level design adjustments that make scholar a lot more fun.

I have arund 2k hours of the original on xbox360, just enjoy it for the ride and realize that the game isn't purely linear at the start. Also that powerstancing is a thing.

My personal favorite style to go is pants only, no level ADP dual caestus build. I've done no death this way and it is just an absolute blast. Some areas are def unfinished, mostly drangleic castle, but I also recommend never boosting the brightness too high as DS2 has a lighting system they used to hide repetition of textures. You always see these screenshots of repeated textures, but it requires you to either cap brightness or install a fullbright mod.

Every time.

Attached: The mind of a DaS2fag.jpg (714x1000, 279.88K)

You do realise the guy youre responding to said DaS2 was worse than DaS3 right?

You realize that has nothing to do with it right?

Attached: 1611590373840.jpg (480x360, 6.76K)

You're talking to a bot

You're proving the image correct (again).

>user says he thinks DaS2 plays like shit, and also adds on that he dislikes DaS3, but not as much
>You reply with strange copypasta about how DaS2 fags always say 3 is worse and awful and how DaS2 is better despite it not being mentioned previously
>...in response to a post where they say 3>2
Yeah okay retard

>ds2 thread
>immediate seething and fingerpointing to 3 out of nowhere

Every time

user the image is specifically saying DaS2 fags say its better than 3. Which isnt what user said. But sure, the image is "correct" if you remove ignore/half of it and only talk about mentioned other games in the series whenever 2 pops up. Then im proving it right I suppose.

Holy cow are 3 fags sensitive

>If you claim to dislike Dark Souls 2, the permanently insecure DaS2 contrarian will approach a frenzy, raving about Dark Souls 3 even if it hasn't been mentioned yet.
Bruh

DS2 pre-patch and post-patch were quite different.

darksouls2.wikidot.com/game-patches

Gets a bad rap, has some issues for sure, but nowhere near as bad as people make out, souls purists lose their shit over it but even a souls game with issues is better than most games on the market.
It's expansive, still as addictive as the rest of the games, and the art direction is FOOKING AWESOME M8

Just stop replying to the fags trying to bait and just discuss DS2.

No idea what version I played, I got it right near release and played it for like 3-4 years after that, vanilla not SOTFS

I like ______ and it's way better than DS3. Did I trigger your tranny hole user?

How long did you play before you stopped noticing the dead zones?