seriously, you literally got Infinite for free, how can you complain about it? if it were some 70 dollar movie game by snoy, I'd understand being pissed off, but this is literally free. what gives?
are they paid shills? I'd be willing to bet if it were snoy doing this with a 70 dollar game, everyone would be defending them. these people unironically don't deserve anything good
Why do people love to complain about Microsoft so much WHEN THE GAMES ARE FREE?
Halo infinite's campaign isn't free though, so your false-flag falls a bit short.
user you pay for the campaign it's not free.
Something being free doesn't excuse it being shit, not to mention it isn't actually free. You know what isn't free? The amount of time it takes to waste on something only to find it it's garbage and never gets better.
>post facts
>DUHHH DUHHH FALSE FLAG DUHHH
take your meds, bootlicker
>it's free if you pay for this service
Last (You) unless you put more effort in.
shit bait user
>leave the multi-billion company alone.png
Or jpg, I don't remember.
vocal minority crying about a lack of local coop. most people play online coop anyway.
>xbox game pass
What is this guy on about, it’s gonna have online coop just not split screen
Why is he sorry? Was he making it?
I couldn't give two fucks about multiplayer.
I just played the single player campaign. It was fantastic. Free Day One on GamePass. Then I moved on to play more games.
>WHEN THE GAMES ARE FREE
I've seen you get the game pass is free on food, user.
Once they get enough people they will increase prices and make tons of money. Oldest trick in the book
>Halo infinite
>Free
Sorry snoy, I can't hear you over the sound of all these games.
It was pretty barebones but the stuff that was in there was solid. And it wasn't too long for an open world game. Could've been a bit more cinematic, but I can understand they didn't have their toolset 100% done during the development of the new codebase.
Halo on the original Xbox was made by a smaller team for a smaller budget, featured coop and competitive multiplayer and a huge player base on launch.
>Once they get enough people they will increase prices and make tons of money
More money, more games. Less games, less subscribers. If the content doesn't please the audience, there won't be enough demand and they'll have to drop the price. What's the issue here again? Game Pass does nothing wrong and as long as it serves its audience then it can continue existing.
"UHHHHH AKCHULLY ITS FREE AS LONG AS YOU PAY FOR IT"
Umm sweetie games are harder to make now our game with 1 biome and copy pasted open world assets would have taken 30 years if not for the tremendous talent of 343i
Damn they already raised prices huh
Theres nothing stopping you from buying the game if you enjoy it after playing on game pass. You can even buy it on Steam.
Wowee
I hate you Frank, you should have stayed a pathetic forum moderator
I hope you, Bonnie, Kiki and Phil get raped, tortured and then killed in Minecraft.
Also the original Hall's scope was much smaller.
>30fps locked framerate (which it didn't achieve most of the time) with a fixed resolution.
VS
>30/60/120 FPS modes with dynamic resolution scaling
And the supported platforms:
>Xbox
VS
>Xbox One/Xbox One X/Xbox Series X/Xbox Series S/PC
content
>Campaign, splitscreen coop, barebones multiplayer
vs.
>Campaign, online coop, forge (much more advanced than before), customization, content delivery systems for Live service stuff, eSports, multiple multiplayer game modes, mouse + keyboard support.
You get the point. You're an idiot for comparing game development 20+ years ago to game development now.