-Inverse 10
-Kinda Funny 5/5
-VG247 5/5
-VGC 5/5
-PlayStation Universe 9
-WellPlayed 9
-VideoGamer 9
-IGN 9
-Telegraph 4/5
-Easy Allies 8.5
Metacritic 88/100: metacritic.com
Opencritic: 88/100 - 95% Recommended
opencritic.com
-Inverse 10
-Kinda Funny 5/5
-VG247 5/5
-VGC 5/5
-PlayStation Universe 9
-WellPlayed 9
-VideoGamer 9
-IGN 9
-Telegraph 4/5
-Easy Allies 8.5
Metacritic 88/100: metacritic.com
Opencritic: 88/100 - 95% Recommended
opencritic.com
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
A fucking 8
8 is generous for such a pointless remake
why do we care about review scores for a remake
SNOOOOORRREEE
>11 year old remaster
>$10 more
>less content
>less modes
>Barely upgraded graphically
Ah yes the Sony bonus
>Terrible deal for consumer
>8
The fuck is wrong with people
Reminder that it’s literally built for Ps5
Stay mad chuds
>easy allies
Aren’t they on the brink of collapse after that one guy completely tranny’d out
>Completely shits on it
>8
Game journalists get the gas
>”remember white girls are built for bbc”
>”even though you’re fucking them with a bigger dick you aren’t getting the full experience because your dick isn’t black like mine”
lool
Did they retcon the ending to make Joel a bad guy?
Yes and I think he's the current boss, director or whatever their leadership position is called.
Expect them to be dead by next year.
>The game has no purpose existing, cut content for no reason and is way overpriced for what it is
>8/10 because Sony's check didn't bounce
Never seen such blatant paid journalism quite like this
>got rid of the only good thing about the original
Shit "game."
I've noticed most of the high scoring reviews are also wondering why this remake exists. I'm guessing they didn't want to face Sony's wrath if they gave it a lower score.
>PS3 gameplay
it's not built for the PS5, fucking retard
None of the big review sites will review it honestly because even if they're not paid off, they know that a twittermob would tear out their throats for giving the heckin trans game series a bad review
Can't wait to play The Last Of Redux on my PS6.
ResetERA are already going after that Metro review for "lying" about it having cut content and a higher price tag
They are actually insane
>Half the content
What the fuck?
Last of Us shills deserve death more than any Russian or Ukrainian.
Doggers, we won!
Is The Last of Us 1 Sony's Skyrim?
I fully expect a remaster of this remake on PS6.
>the heckin trans game
The original game has none of that shit in it. And Ellie wasn't even a lesbo in the first game.
I'm sure the remake is full on tranny woke shit now though.
Wh t Fu?
The multiplayer got cut, because they don't want it interfering with the standalone multiplayer game that ND is working on.
The entire multiplayer mode has been removed.
>my new favorite exclusive on the console.
HOW DID HE MAKE SUCH A HARD DECISION?!
>It has a little something for everyone
It's more like sony's schindler's list
So what kind of new trash did Drunkman include in the remake?
8 seems pretty generous
Well if they had given it a 7 then the money would stop coming in
>not even a 9/10
oh nononoonononion
Metro.co.uk is one of the gaming review sites I trust more, but they sometimes miss. The fuckers give Three Hopes a 4/10
Kinda sad seeing the state of naughty dog nowadays, they used to be a really good .
jackie chan stuntmaster on the ps1 is an 8/10
youtube.com
>exclusive
>releases on Steam in 2 weeks
>exclusive
Why do faggots keep using that word
He made all the women uglier for whatever reason.
Tess and Maria look like they're 50.
Same fanbase, the actress for Ellie is trans now, you'd be insane to touch that game with a ten feet pole as a reviewer right now
This is the problem I have with remakes, especially ones that didn't need it since TLOU was fine on it's own, it's you know how shitty it ends with TLOU 2, so why the fuck would you bother playing the first one again?
Sounds about right
Probably part of Sony's review guidelines
wow a movie game getting early 10/10 scores across the board
never seen that before
What the fuck, and people are defending this?
Last of Us is probably the worst gaming franchise to exist.
Never played it and never will
Just insane fanboys are defending this. Most people aren't interested in this game for now, as it's going to be full priced. Yes, this is $70.
returnal is the best video game of the past 5 years
The same people shitting on this also bought the Wii-U->Switch ports.
Cuckman was a mistake for this brand company
It may be pointless and a bad value but it's still one of the greatest games of all time, anything less than an 8 on that fact alone would be blatant lying
Those are good though.
>it's still one of the greatest games of all time
lol
kek
90% of switch owners didn't own a Wii U, and you couldn't just put a Wii U disc in a switch and play it
it's over.
youtube.com
Holy fuck the Sony bonus is real
>it's still one of the greatest games of all tim-
Lol
Lmao
Umm Giant Bomb actually became based after the old guard left? That one chick they hired is kind of cute and not annoying as shit like Abby as well
fucking hell are they serious
What the fuck
Citizen Kane of gaming.
Don't ever go full retard, user.
Yep.
Nobody still watches giant bomb.
They had to make their premium content free and people still won't watch it.
>if I were to judge this superfluous remake as what it is I'd give it a 70, but I love the original so it's a 100
What the fuck am I reading, the original already fucking exists, that experience has been out there for almost a decade. Why would you a review a remake on any grounds but it justifying its own existence compared to the original?
>Nintendo is shitty and doesn't support BC
>this makes it okay to charge $60 for ports
kek
delete this