This is a great game

This is a great game.

Fuck you if you disagree. Your loss.

Attached: loyl.jpg (1280x720, 120.38K)

AC stopped being good after 2

cool story bro

Oh no. Am I going to miss out on the latest anti-white propaganda? If you weren't full of shit you wouldn't be making this thread right now.

Nah.

Of the nu-AC games, Origins was good, Odyssey was so-so, Valhalla is shit.

It unironically is.
What I don't get is why it performs like shit on PC, this crap fucking flies at consistent 60 fps on xshit in 4k, but on my reasonably powerful computer it stutters at 1080p. Why are Ubisoft games like this? Are they fucking played in an emulator?

Assassin's Creed was never good

how pozzed is the London and Greece AC?

Are Ubishills jealous that Violition are getting all the attention?

Alright, it's ok user, I like the first Watch Dogs alot, we all have our guilty pleasures.

Attached: Watch-Dogs-Aiden-Pearce-1024x683.jpg (1024x683, 93.61K)

Literally the worst in the series.
t. someone who unironically loves these games

The gun porn in that game is so fucking good.

You can re-enact Heat with the ambush side missions. Not to mention the gun executions, so fucking satisfying.

I’m currently playing origins. It’s pretty good. I’m glad valhalla is good. Means I can look forward to it.

Only zoomers think this

London was shit. Greece has some faggotry but its easily ignored.

*1
FTFY

I just downloaded syndicate. That’s a shame it’s not good. Thankfully I got it for free.

exploring is good but then once again it's not historically accurate at all. fucking stone castles before the normans nigga?

>exploring is good but then once again it's not historically accurate at all
AC never was historically accurate.

Sick of this fucking criticism. Oh yeah bro, totally historically accurate sect of assassins killing historical figures in crusades era middle east and rennaisance Italty.

Retards still don't know the difference between realism and authenticity.

Too much shit. Too much filler. fuck the jotumheim sections. I can’t believe they made an entire dlc out of the worst fucking part of the game.
The map makers and the composers are the only people at ubisoft pulling their weight anymore.

AC has always been a "best of" amalgamation of what everyone knows and expects from each era. If you want historical accuracy, read a history book (good luck finding one not tainted by the authors bias).

Valhalla literally has multiple black vikings and trannies which nobody questions

>This is a great game.
>Only zoomers think this
Literally a TW3 clone and the furthest it could be from being an AC game.
Fuck off, bunch of zoomer retards.

Origins is objectively better in every way.
Bayek>Eivor. simple as.

>sect of assassins killing historical figures in crusades era middle east and rennaisance Italty.

when everything else is consistent and intrinsic, stone castles are out of place. and that's just one example i could go on forever

Attached: acviking.jpg (3840x2160, 795.05K)

we do but ac hasn't been authentic since odyssey

The reason I can tell you are a zoomer is because you think the old AC games were good.

Why would it be "my loss" to not play shit game?

I'm still waiting for it to come to Steam so I'll take your word for it

projecting faggot like bad flopped games