Starfield will set a new standard for gaming and for years and years studios will try to copy it and will fail miserably

There's not only 4 cities.

Star Citizen is barebone yet it's far more impressive than Starfield in every way. Sure, it has taken a decade and half a billion but masterpieces take time and resources

*SIPPPPPPPP*
>It doesn't need to have seamless flying and landing (No Man's Sky had this)
>it doesn’t need unique assets for individual planets
>It doesn't need ladders or seamless interiors-exteriors transition
>it doesn’t need good or exciting combat
>it doesn’t need sentient alien species
>it doesn’t need original or interesting planet/ship/weapon designs
>it doesn’t need to launch with creation kit day one
>it doesn’t need to have a settlement system better than Fallout 4’s
>it doesn’t need to have a progression/perk system that does anything other than tweak some damage integers
>it doesn’t need to use an engine better than Gamebryo
>it doesn’t need to run higher than 24 fps
>it doesn’t need white people
>it doesn’t need to have handcrafted planets
>it doesn’t need to have resource harvesting that’s different than NMS’s system
>It doesn't need actual roleplaying mechanics
>It doesn't need meaningful traits
>It doesn't need an actual dialogue system
>It doesn't need varied RPG branching quests
>It doesn't matter that the focus is on radiant quest, its shitty shooting and looting
>it doesn’t need to have graphics better than 2015 standards
>it doesn’t need to have traditional male/female selections in character creation
>It doesn't need to have more than 4 cities
>It doesn't matter that the main story quest lasts only 30 hours
>It doesn't need to have different beginnings and starting points depending on the origin (Cyberflop had this)
>It doesn't need atmospheric flight even though the trailed showed enemy ships in atmospheric flight
YOU ARE NOW HERE
>it doesn’t need fauna AI more complex than NMS’s
>It doesn't need branching story paths
>It doesn't need a good story
>It doesn't need good sidequests
>It doesn't need varied sidequests
>It doesn't need to be good

Attached: It's tOddVER.jpg (586x641, 46.67K)

Sure hope not. I don't want games that abuse fast travel to the extreme, and neglect exploration.

It'll be a fun and comfy game with the usual Bethesda jank that will make the usual Any Forums shitposters absolutely livid with seethe and cope and a minimum of 5 "ohnonono" threads on the front page for a few weeks after launch.

>it doesn’t need to have handcrafted planets
it's not POSSIBLE to have handcrafted planets you absolute troglodyte

Wowsers another overhyped disappointment!? Can't wait!!!

>Zune
Fail
>Bing
Fail
>Windows Vista
Fail
>Microsoft Band
Fail
>Windows 8
Fail
>Windows Phones
Fail
>Mixer
Fail
>GFWL
Fail
>OG Xbox
Fail
>360
RROD
>Xbox One
Fail
>360 Kinect
Fail
>Kinect 2.0
Fail
>Sea of Theives
Fail
>Crackdown 3
Fail
>Halo 5
Fail
>Halo Infinite
Fail

Reminder they also killed Rare, introduced paid online to online console gaming, want to strip all ownership away from the consumer by making everything digital-only on Xcloud and Gamepass, and all off their exclusives are mtx-riddled pay-to-win garbage like Sea of Thieves, Gears4&5, and Halo 5.

It's also funny that some of you think buying Bethesda is going to save them. Bethesda hasn't made a good game since Skyrim, the rest of their games can't even hit metacritic scores of 80. Let's not also forget they let Bethesda put the Horse Amour DLC on the 360 marketplace back in 2007. If they hadn't done that, microtranstations and other bullshit greedy DLC practices wouldn't even be a thing today.

Microsoft is the most greedy, anti-consumer, monopolistic, disgusting company there is. Stop defending their shit, Any Forums.

The SERIES ASS is an amerimutt-hybrid shit cucksole designed to scam the consumer renting tranny indie games and 14 year old 360 games like goyim cattle.

If you buy and/or support Microsoft in any way, even ironically, you deserve death.

>look up skyrim metacritic
>90 from critics, 80something for users, pretty good overall
>look up fo4 metacritic
>50 user score
What the FUCK went wrong with fo4? I think this warrants a serious discussion.

>What the FUCK went wrong with fo4?
They listened to their worst and loudest fans, and focused on companions and settlement building.

Mediocre as shit. Feels more like a fallout 3 expansion DLC than a full fledged "next gen" entry.
It really solidified the fact that Bethesda was falling behind in game development.
Also the base building is gay.