Why is
>"you agreed to the Terms of Service"
the motto of modern leftists?
Leftists throughout history were never more than the grunts of international finance, but when it comes to video games they're fully mask-off about it for some reason.
Why is
Because 99% of everything is catered to them or bowed down to them
For example, the case where a diaper wearing, scat fetishist, it/its individual felt the need to talk about gay sex over and over until they were banned due to the TOS saying no fetish or sexuality talk. They were banned, unbanned, had the entire chat shut down, and made the game itself issue an apology to "it" and the TOS changed
They just don't want dissenting speech in general, the ideology is nothing more than window dressing since they'll prevent through illegal and legal methods.
People who fall for their gaslighting are dumb.
tabletop sim btw, the google doc is still out there if you dont believe me
I don't consider myself morally obligated to any ToS that I didn't bother to read
I say it because it's funny I have no political affiliation,
Marx's communism was a ploy to centralize bank in a single entity handled by the Rothschilds.
Also videogames
>agree to set of rules
>break rules
>recieve punishment
>AAAAAA ITZ DA EVIL LEFTISTS
I genuinely don't get it.
Isn't this just one of the realities of capitalism? You could just not buy shitty troon games and either pirate them or buy something else if you think it's worth giving the company money to make a product you like.
At this point, I'm convinced these guys are the literal embodiment of "rules for thee, and not for me."
boot licking
obviously corporations should be regulated to prevent this
Literally nobody actually thinks this, you don't base your worldview around every law that currently governs you and you don't think that it's wrong to break stupid or harmful rules.
You're only saying this because corporations align with your McValues and you're more than comfortable with them forcing those ideals onto everyone else on your behalf.
>You're only saying this because corporations align with your McValues and you're more than comfortable with them forcing those ideals onto everyone else on your behalf.
how do you feel about the supreme court decision that allowed bakeries to refuse service for gay weddings?
Remember hating him due to being a shit eater is hecking oppression, shut the fuck up you bigot
terms of service/contracts are a pretty capitalistic thing, my man.
politics these days really are just "this thing I don't like IS THE OTHER SIDE'S FAULT" without anything to back it up.
I don't think faggotry should be legal at all, unlike you i'm not a slimy, dishonest rat about it.
You're justifying your position with "those are just the rules so you should follow them haha" when you don't actually think this yourself, you're just a manipulative, dishonest golem and can't openly admit that you think your opposition should be suppressed, despite that obviously being your position.
acting like you're oppressed because a business has a right to keep you from shouting slurs at customers in the domain of their business is retarded.
>you're just a manipulative, dishonest golem
says the guy that dodged the question
It's their right to refuse service to whomever they want.
not legally binding
You might have paid me to let me allow you into my garden, but you're still playing by my rules here. If you break them, back to streets you go. It is my property.
That sounds more like an ancap motto.
>but when it comes to video games they're fully mask-off about it for some reason.
Not just vidya. Remember how leftists were very largely anti big-pharma? Now they've become the biggest fucking nutlickers for pharmaceutical companies. Even funnier when they WERE intensely hesitant about the "Trump vaccine" until it started being deployed under Not Trump.
Then burn the several tens of thousands of dollars it would take to sue them and maybe get a refund for your trouble.
It's called the free market commie fuck
Missed your containment board, let me help you out
It's not hard to not call people racial slurs. Hopefully your LoL ban will teach you some humility
Based, although I don't agree with you.
I believe that political opinion should be protected under the civil rights act, and that freedom of speech should extend to "freedom from consequences" unless there's a credible threat of violence/harm AND that corporations should not receive constitutional rights they are not individuals.
How easily he predicted your cowardice.
It's actually illegal for a business that's open to the public to refuse service based on a protected class.
Video games.
You know that's not the extent of this, you're literally incapable of arguing honestly about anything.
I can openly say that i think jewish capitalists and their shabbos goyim should hang from trees because I know what i believe in is right and true, you should reflect on why every argument you will ever make needs to be veiled under twenty layers of minimization, strawmanning, ridicule and deliberate misrepresentation.
I didn't dodge the question, i went beyond the scope of it.
Of course business should be able to refuse service to faggots, but that's really only a minor step when in reality public displays of LGBTP behavior should not be legal in any way.
It's even easier to close your eyes.
>agree to set of rules
>break rules
>rules get changed