Recommend non-strategy war games that are games and not grind simulators

Recommend non-strategy war games that are games and not grind simulators

Attached: 1568410656297.jpg (802x500, 120.37K)

If Germans were so strong, why did they lose?

valkyria chronicles

The whole war was a false flag by the jews, they planned for the holocaust to happen so they would get eternal victimhood status and eventually rule the world. Hitler was a jew.

>whole world had to gang up on them to stop them from taking russia and africa
Yeah, dunno why they lost.

They didn't know when to stop.
All they had to do was not invade Russia. If they kept punishing the UK they would have forced them into an indefinite armstice. They desperately needed time so they could consolidate their gains.

Instead of fortifying the coastline and invading the USSR, they should have fortified the USSR border and kept their men in Europe, so they could actually consolidate gains and keep putting pressure into Britain.

Attached: 1647296652104.jpg (1620x1080, 239.05K)

Allies were stronger

they were running out of fuel big time and heavily underrstimated the capabilities of the ussr which led them to invade the soviets and go for their oilfields

Or if they just consolidated their territory rather than trying to split France into two and making a puppet state.
If Germany declared victory once they defeated France and cease hostilities, there would have been little appetite in the UK to continue hostilities with a nation that isn't attacking you, and hasn't occupied your closest ally and had just pushed you back your entire army.

user, the western front started to exist when the russians were shelling berlin.
russia won WW2 pretty much single-handedly.

BONUS KEK:
>germans had like a dozen allied countries, endless foreign legions, and actually OUTNUMBERED THE RUSSIANS when the invasion started

actually educating yourself about WW2 is quite an eye opener.

Attached: nazi foreign legions.jpg (1200x1600, 449.66K)

they got buck broken.

Attached: file.png (1024x768, 785.18K)

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 1.08M)

They lost Stalingrad and Kursk just fine by themselves.
*Russians received some material aid by allies

are you implying america actually did something in WW2 besides firebombing starving gooks on an island?

>make a pact with your strongest neighbour so you can wreck shit in peace
>backstab said neighbour before even finishing your war with your other neighbours
>your overly bloodthirsty ally backstabs another strong player and forces them into the war
>end up fighting the 2 strongest forces in the world while you still haven't finished the war you started to begin with
>wtf why did I lose I did nothing wrong?

.....what events are you talking about?
jesus christ.

>Molotov-Ribbentop Pact
>Operation Barbarossa
>Pearl Harbor
>rest of WW2
It's not that hard.

Yes he is and he is correct.

Kursk was after American and British forces had succeeded in North Africa and were invading SIcily and Italy and conducting bombing raids on Germany itself.

>British Free Corps
>John Amery pleaded guilty to eight charges of treason. He was immediately sentenced to death. The trial lasted just eight minutes.
>John Amery ... I am satisfied that you knew what you did and that you did it intentionally and deliberately after you had received warning from ... your fellow countrymen that the course you were pursuing amounted to high treason. They called you a traitor and you heard them; but in spite of that you continued in that course. You now stand a self-confessed traitor to your King and country, and you have forfeited your right to live.
>Amery was hanged in Wandsworth Prison on 19 December 1945 by executioner Albert Pierrepoint, who in his autobiography described Amery as "the bravest person I'd ever hanged"

Pretty based.

That wasn't much of an option. One of their major goals was to humiliate France as revanchism for Versailes. France was never going to get off easy.

All them more reason to end the war now, not later. They could have gone for the Oil on the middle east instead.

Attached: 1646919647565.gif (720x576, 2.33M)

But seriously, as early as the German-Soviet co-operation on tank training, their generals were already complaining about fuel shortages.

Attached: 1428135473582.gif (768x695, 62.25K)

>Humiliate France for humiliating you
>Get humiliated in the process
There's a story about revenge here.

They didn’t have the population, production or resources to continue a long war of attrition against an enemy with near-exhaustible amounts of both - much less 2.

lads, americans did jack shit in europe in WW2.
i know holywood told you otherwise, but real life isnt holywood.
russia won WW2 pretty much alone, deal with it.
i dont like it, you dont like it, history doesnt care.
what happened, happened.

Brainwashed slav(e) hands typed this post.

>Russia won WW2 alone
>Using British and American equipment, whilst living off British and American food and building their own equipment with British and American resources..

>They didn’t have the population
biggest in europe
>production or resources
they had both.
>a long war of attrition
it was supposed to last a month.
thats why barbarossa started in spring/summer.
oopsie, i guess.

All the more reason not to push their luck with more wars. They had Oil from Romania even if it wasn't much, but it should have been enough to keep pummeling the UK into submission.

The Pact with Japan was also a big mistake.

Soviet Union definitely did the most but the US definitely had tangible impact in North Africa and Italy, of course France, and basically was producing more than even the Soviets could imagine as well keeping the UK in the war.

So why did they?

>who killed 90% of germans in ww2?
>OH FUCK OFF YOU YOU YOU YOU......

Attached: 1511182721933.jpg (900x885, 282.53K)

>Russia trying to win a WW2 revisionism contest with Japan be like

>>Russia won WW2 alone
yes
>>Using British and American equipment, whilst living off British and American food
>british
excuse me, the what?

ahem, let me educate you - britain didnt have SHIT, in fact - they were the RECIPIENT of LEND LEASE and received THREE TIMES AS MUCH SHIT FROM AMERICA, COMPARED TO RUSSIA.

>AWW
>GEEZ

das right.
without american shit, the poor brits would fucking starve to death.

Attached: lend lease.jpg (1119x484, 101.81K)