What's the game equivalent?

What's the game equivalent?

Attached: 1659407866288632.jpg (913x415, 76.5K)

Why cant boomers appreciate the starwars prequels? They are great political dramas, seriously, whats up with them?

Phantom Menace is the best Star Wars movie. Its perfectly balanced in every way

DaS2 long form critique.

They also have kino visual styles. Boomers are retarded.

MMO revisionists who think that changes for "convenience" improved rather than killed every MMO.

Dark souls 2, dragon age 2, mass effect 3 and fallout 3

It's my favorite. But I admit Jar Jar was annoying and I completely agree with the idea that they gave him too much screen time.
That said, I don't like that they threw him aside in the next movies. Even as a child I remember feeling that was weird, that a character just wasn't part of the story anymore.

That's the problem with those prequels. They were made to please an already existing audience with high expectations, while also trying to include a new generation. And I think that is the logic behind "subverting expectations" in the new ones. Which, obviously, was an even worse take than trying to please everybody. I mean, aside from Kylo, which could have been improved in the next ones, the Jew Jew Abraham's one was pretty decent and set up the mood.

Unironically almost every game ever made. Most games go through some form of reevaluation over time. That’s how critical discourse works.

People who grew up with the OT went into the Prequels with the wrong expectations. They expected an OT rehash (i.e what the Disney Wars trilogy would become) rather than a new story. Notice how most people who grew up with the Prequels look back on them fondly because they didn’t have these preconceived biases. It wasn’t due to them not seeing the OT either, since the OT was easily available and aired on TV regularly throughout the 2000s.

Also, the Prequels were incredibly ahead of their time. They pioneered certain CG technology that’s now used as a mainstay in a lot of Hollywood movies today. Meaning the technology was cutting edge at the time.

They were narratively ahead of their time too (a story about an internally decaying democracy wasn’t something a lot of 2000s audiences could connect with, whereas a 2010s-2020s audience would be able to draw obvious parallels with the modern world).

Boomers are genuinely too low IQ for the prequels.
If the bad guy isn’t blatantly the bad guy by looking like a bad guy and killing puppies every 3 minutes, then it’s too smart for them.
The prequels still had the antagonist look like a bad guy, but the emperor in the prequels wasn’t totally outlandishly evil, and was pretty understandable, while the Jedi were often in grey areas as well.

>They are great political dramas

Attached: 1387226360666.gif (288x198, 1.45M)

I like the fact that the prophecy was about Anakin bringing balance to the force.
He killed the Jedi when they were getting too strong.
He killed the Sith when they were getting too strong.
All he did was bring balance when the force needed it.
Fuck Luke

Is this from Plinkett TFA?

3D Adventure-Era Sonic

The hourly "FF13 was actually kino" threads

The prophecy didn't mean shit, but the average star wars nerd didn't understand that and instead focused on Breast and Jizz being things that existed in-universe.

>Also, the Prequels were incredibly ahead of their time. They pioneered certain CG technology that’s now used as a mainstay in a lot of Hollywood movies today. Meaning the technology was cutting edge at the time.
This is always been a terrible fucking argument. Being a good tech demo has no bearing on being a good game or movie. What matters is how the tech was used, not that’s it’s impressive in of itself and before you rush to their defense, I actually like the prequels. I just REALLY despise this particular argument.

On the topic of Star Wars, KOTOR 2 seems to have undergone revision over the years. Back in the early 2000s, the common opinion used to be that KOTOR 1 was better, but now that opinion seems to be reversed, with some people even saying that KOTOR 1 was never that good to begin with.

I wouldn’t downplay Luke. Sure, he wasn’t the chosen one, but he was the final piece of the puzzle to ensure that the prophecy was fulfilled.

Return of the Jedi is literally the completion of the prophecy.

What are some games where the bad guy was hiding right under the player’s nose?

Attached: 15351F91-8F60-47A3-B5F0-D3EB8798B7B0.jpg (1461x834, 110.04K)

>a 2010s-2020s audience would be able to draw obvious parallels with the modern world
kek? you think politics were invented in 2010 or something?
I agree with you though

Attached: Fable TLC.jpg (313x445, 31.59K)

KOtOR

star wars died in 1999 and nothing gaslighting zoomers say will convince anyone otherwise

Empire is the only good movie in the entire series.

>the common opinion used to be that KOTOR 1 was better, but now that opinion seems to be reversed
Exact same story and scenario and fanboy reaction as fallout. Same studio involved to really make it a parody. xsnngv

you're dying earlier too, granpa, so it's just a matter of time

They were the biggest shills for the sequels.

Of course it wasn’t. In fact, The Prequels are obviously a partial allegory for the War on Terror, however (especially when you consider that TPM came out pre-9/11), there wasn’t quite as much political cynicism during the 90s and early 2000s as there is now, so general audiences likely missed the point Lucas was trying to make.

For example, some Prequel haters back then criticised the idea that Palpatine controlling both sides of the conflict made no sense. I doubt many people would say that nowadays where the idea of fake proxy wars is something that the public are a bit more aware of.

>the Jedi were guardians of galactic peace for a thousand generations
>it's only in Anakin's time when they're "too strong" though
>twenty years later when there's still only two Sith they're also somehow "too strong"
the only way that's remotely balanced is if the Force considers 1 Sith to be worth like 1000 Jedi