Where do people even go for reviews these days? I feel like if it's not a 4 hour analysis it's not worth watching

Where do people even go for reviews these days? I feel like if it's not a 4 hour analysis it's not worth watching.

Attached: b45.png (500x435, 107.04K)

I scan threads here and filter for posts longer than two sentences without reddit buzzwords in them to see if it's something I might be interested in.

GmanLives for shooters. Zero Punctuation for everything else.

Check open critic and then gameplay video + steam average

He was referring to water type Pokemon. I hate game journos too but you don't have to be a retarded faggot.

>He was referring to water type Pokemon

Gman is definitely a good reviewer, entertaining and tries to look for things to appreciate even in games that are shit

I just watch trailers and gameplay footage to know if I will like it.

Unironically Any Forums. If the general consensus is "it's good", then it's bad. If the general consensus is "it's bad" then it's bad. If people are flinging shit about it back and forth then it's probably controversial enough to at least merit a play through.

I can tell if a game is good just by looking at a couple minutes of gameplay, some of the promo material, and the response around it. You don't need reviews sites.

>this makes pokefags seethe to this day
Intentional design does not equate to good design. Simple as that.

I just play games myself. If I cared about critic reviews I would have never played one of the best third person shooters ever made.

Attached: file.png (403x280, 58.24K)

i check to see if all my tranny friends are planning it to see if its over hyped garbage

He wasn't, but it's still a valid criticism because half of the game's routes are water routes and there's no fucking pokemon variety on them, just WIngull/Pelliper/Tentacool for the entire time you're surfing on them. It's absolutely bullshit and I hate fucking Hoenniggers who try to pretend that just because IGN made a bulletpoint out of the shittiest aspect of their stupid fucking game it's suddenly not a valid criticism.

steam reviews, maybe check well written negative ones to see if there's something I wouldn't like about the game
for console games I check gameplay videos or whatever short review pops up first
at this point I already know what I like anyway, so it's more about the general quality of the game and people's perception of it is a good indicator most of the time

never Any Forums though

>Winback 64
>66

I just ask here
and watch worthabuy, but don't really listen to him since it seems he's just jaded now, but at least he doesn't suck corporate dick

"[GameName] Gameplay No Commentary" is all I need to quickly determine if I'll bother with a game or not. Then a bit of negative reviews on Steam.

PS2 version is better

ACG

Where is the lie? Do Pokefags think engaging water type Pokemon for 30% of the game is fucking fun?

I just make threads here because anons are actually more trustworthy at this point and youtubers are massive faggots.

There is literally nothing wrong with this review.

I make posts about how the game I'm thinking of playing sucks and let the people coming in to defend the game make arguments for why the game is worth playing