Why was this made when the Steam Deck already exists?

Why was this made when the Steam Deck already exists?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 94.4K)

free money for an old game

Because the Switch has sold over 100m units, it's a pretty safe bet to say that a couple million of those haven't played Portal before.

but those games can run on decade old toasters and the pc versions are cheap as dirt

Valve is afraid...

So can a lot of indie games that release on the Switch, yet they still sell well there, so there's clearly an audience for that.

Because porting it is cheap as fuck and it allows them to sell it to people who already own a switch but not a steam deck.
You might as well ask why Bethesda ports Skyrim for the 20th time.

Attached: 60F70D27-9BBD-463C-A624-CA68E54F7EE2.jpg (1024x937, 56.54K)

Deckfags wouldn't play it otherwise

It's to recoup the costs of selling the Deck at a loss. Nintendies are literally funding their own demise.

An apology for the whipping valve does to the switch

cause they can, and with it still not running at a fluid 60 (even with Nvidia porting it), it's a good comparison for deck

to test new porting tools
t. knower

Why was the steam deck made when the switch and desktop pcs exist?

The better question is why half life 1 and 2 aren't included.

I want to know why oblivion, fallout 3 and NV haven't been ported yet. It's easy money. Microsoft has an army of code macacos that could port it while Bethesda works on their autism projects

Nobody wants to look at Oblivion-era uncanny valley potato faces.

nah TESfags will take anything while they wait for VI you are kidding yourself

Right, but do 5 year olds own PCs?

pretty sure their parents do

because a lot of switch owners do not play games on their pcs.
any more stupid questions?

WHERE THE FUCK IS TF2 FOR SWITCH???

>have Source running on Xbox / PS2 / 360 / PS3
>need to justify porting it to ARM
>make a Switch port

there were several source android ports on the nvidia shield