Why are singleplayer 2.5D fps (ie. 3D environments with 2D enemies and objects) objectively better than 3D ones?

Why are singleplayer 2.5D fps (ie. 3D environments with 2D enemies and objects) objectively better than 3D ones?

Attached: 1646327428653.jpg (1280x720, 297.16K)

bump

got Project Warlock in the steam sale and absolutely loved it. Is there anything similar out there (besides the sequel)?

Your boomer brainrot is showing gramps. Maybe your brain is unable to process 3D objects.

ok zoomer

the ironic thing is that 2.5d shooters tend to be a lot more hectic than 3d ones.

YO IS THIS BORDERLANDS!?

Zoomers don't play Borderlands (that has long fallen from its glory days), they play Dusk and Ion Fury while millennials play Borderlands and Disco Elysium and call zoomers Any Forumstards for not wanting pozzed games written by Anthony Burch

Attached: 580 (1).jpg (800x614, 61.35K)

2.5D feels fucking terrible compared to 3D

lol
lmao

3dpd is shit, as always

Attached: catalan.jpg (2560x1706, 614.52K)

What game is that?

>implying zoomies have ever even heard of those games
Weak b8.

Project warlock 2

>Zoomers don't play Borderlands (that has long fallen from its glory days), they play Dusk and Ion Fury while Trooners play Borderlands and Disco Elysium and call Zoomers Any Forumstards for not wanting pozzed games written by Anthony Burch
ftfy

So zoomers play indieshit fps that look and play worse than Quake? Gotcha

Attached: dd5.jpg (680x409, 46.79K)

Because they are still made by devs who played those kind of games when they were kids and want to recreate what made those great so they generaly have an interesting setting, fun weapons, good enemy design, secrets and easter eggs.
Enjoy it while it lasts.

Pretty sure boomer shooters are played primarily by millennials while zoomers who enjoy FPS will play the big AAAs releasing on their consoles.

Quake is a 3D game.

>Muh Quake
>A grenade ambush at every corner
>Ambush ambush ambush
>10 hours of ambushes against stationary enemies, most of those won't even move
You must be mentally deranged or just a retard whose personality is idolizing "classics" if you think Quake plays better than Dusk or Ion Fury

>besides the sequel
the sequel is not similar at all, and the dev is getting shat on because of it and his weird ideas.
most crazies wait for success before going completely batshit.

I started with FPS games in the 90s and don't like the old games. I prefer RtCW, HL1, MoHAA or CoD1/WaW.

the first game is a terrible wolf3d-style game which has been horribly outdated for 19 years now, the sequel plays like a proper 2.5D shooter with great level design instead of nondescript mazes

Project Warlock 1 is shit

Frame-precise actions

>Ion Fury
As if zoomers would play anything actually running on the build engine, but yeah Dusk is the quintessential boomer shooter for zoomers, but it's good so who cares