Why are singleplayer 2.5D fps (ie. 3D environments with 2D enemies and objects) objectively better than 3D ones?

Why are singleplayer 2.5D fps (ie. 3D environments with 2D enemies and objects) objectively better than 3D ones?

Attached: 1646327428653.jpg (1280x720, 297.16K)

bump

got Project Warlock in the steam sale and absolutely loved it. Is there anything similar out there (besides the sequel)?

Your boomer brainrot is showing gramps. Maybe your brain is unable to process 3D objects.

ok zoomer

the ironic thing is that 2.5d shooters tend to be a lot more hectic than 3d ones.

YO IS THIS BORDERLANDS!?

Zoomers don't play Borderlands (that has long fallen from its glory days), they play Dusk and Ion Fury while millennials play Borderlands and Disco Elysium and call zoomers Any Forumstards for not wanting pozzed games written by Anthony Burch

Attached: 580 (1).jpg (800x614, 61.35K)

2.5D feels fucking terrible compared to 3D

lol
lmao