Choose

Choose

Attached: 0-Jak-vs-Ratchet.jpg (1710x900, 198.44K)

Why does Sony pander to fur fags

Attached: 1656653611708.jpg (851x1024, 118.93K)

>Scrimblo vs. Cereal mascot
Gee, tough choice.

>soulless Jak vs soulless Ratchet
Tough choice, for the wrong reasons

Jak easy

LOMBAX TIDDIES

Ratchet's only missteps were R&C 2016 and Secret Agent Clank. Jak was never good.

Sly

Jak and Daxter was better than the best Ratchet

The Future R&C games are also bad, Deadlocked gets shit on too much I'll agree but that was the last good game. It's been 17 years of average at best games since then

I choose the series with more than 1 good game.

Attached: 1587839707423.png (973x1200, 438.66K)

Jak and daxter then, good choice my friend.
Jak 2 is very high quality, and something of a pleb filter, I agree.

conflicted, I think Jak's platforming aged better than ratchet's shooting, even with the gta jank included, but jak 3 is such a whimper of an ending to the trilogy.

>I'm gonna KILL praxis
Jak and Daxter was the only good game in their series. 2 was a boring slog for the most part. 3 Would have been okay if not for all the unfun mini games and how short it was.

Ratchet's series was way better.
>1 was awesome and lengthy
>2 was perfection, I played through this so much
>3 went overboard on some weapons and had a lot of unfun minigames like qwark's video games
>Deadlocked was alright and I had someone to coop with so that made it better

chad and daxter
vs
reddit and cope

That's not the name of the games.

sorry ding dong

The one that died with dignity.

So neither of them.

Ratchet 2 holds up very well in modern world. Jak series is an epitome of bad gamedesign

GOAL is based so jak has to be my pick.

I always thought Jak was better than Ratchet.

A crack in time was great you shit eater.

Attached: 1657077609960.jpg (622x334, 40.06K)