Monitors

no games use multiple monitors, numbnuts

t.

Attached: 1655927093770.jpg (4032x2268, 1.5M)

Don't fall for memes, get a CRT for free

Attached: crt.jpg (565x850, 74.88K)

>All have some terrible reviews and good reviews.
You either accept IPS being the shit it is or not.

theres nothing wrong with IPS. The only alternative is a 42"+ monstrosity with horrible DPI on your desktop which you would be unable to use from a normal sitting distance

This world is a fucking nightmare, abandoning technology without a suitable replacement. Will micro led fix this or will I be looking at blurry garbage until I die?

>tfw no good affordable 4k 60hz+ monitors yet

>theres nothing wrong with IPS
Aside from IPS glow, horrible backlight bleed and no contrast
>The only alternative is a 42"+ monstrosity with horrible DPI on your desktop which you would be unable to use from a normal sitting distance
Posting from 43" 4K TV lmao. It's good to have like 1.5 meter of spare space

there actually was a suitable replacement, there was a tech where every pixel on the screen was a tiny CRT, but it got patent trolled by I believe it was kodak, and thus has never managed to see the light of day.

Something I'm too brianlet to understand is gsync compatible and gsync ultimate and all that. I got a monitor from a friend and it is gsync compatible and also HDR. HDR looks good in games that use it but apparently you can't have gsync and HDR at the same time unless you have gsync ultimate? I don't know what's going on.

you're going to use it for hours everyday for a decent chunk of your life, if there is a purchase to splurge on it's that.

motion clarity in the grand scheme of things isn't that important. Displaying text in the most efficient manner possible is why lcd won out.

>motion clarity in the grand scheme of things isn't that important
only for non-interactive media. any game with scrolling is aggressively hindered by motion blur.

24-27" oled monitor when

Blurry garbage until you di-
-well nah actually, kinda nah.

World finally came around to integer scaling. Only problem with integer scaling is that ugh...you can only really use an integer so the best panel size for that is around 4k and that's probably the size to go for at a not too hueg size. 27" 4k's still the best bang for your buck "I don't wanna stress my GPU 24/7" kinda panel and 1440p on 27" 4k display isn't so bad if you have a decent scaler (previously 6 tap in gsync panels)
1440p will get you integer scaling for 1280x720 but in my experience and I'm an all low muh frames kinda guy who gets made fun of for N64 looking games: it's a bit rough if you're a triple a graphicsfag zoomer.

Probably the best duo would be something like a 27 inch 1440p panel @ 240hz AND a 4k 27" panel that can do 120hz at the very least.
TV? No bigger than 40 i- oh right manufacturers decide that too. Sucks.

Better news tho. DLDSR isn't utter shit at least, so downscaling on a 1440p or 1080p display isn't nearly as awful as it used to be but still not good enough to replace y'know just using 2 different monitors at the same size.
Still, you had a nice big 27" widescreen CRT? None of that shit would matter. You could enjoy the best of every world without even getting into the hardcore panelfag autism that plagues the internet from buyer's remorse faggots wanting to consolewar fucking tech of all things.

gsync compatible's usually just a freesync monitor that can do gsync too
gsync ultimate's what old gsync used to be where the monitors have a board that makes them do gsync inside, on some old monitors the gsync boards even used to have tiny 40mm fans lmao