Who Did

Who Did
IT Better?

Attached: brawlers.jpg (804x902, 417.2K)

I like them both.

Streets of Rage 4 and Remake, no other beat em ups come close to what the two of them accomplish

>half-assed coombait vs half-assed nostalgiabait

Me! :)

River City Girls is such a cool concept and they did it so well so how the fuck did they screw up the gameplay so badly what the FUCK

Attached: 1304495936086.png (230x230, 8.22K)

Those are all enjoyable!

They're different kind of beatem ups. TMNT is more like an arcade game, RCG was more like a home console game.

Having different reset timers on enemies is so fundamental to making a functioning beat em up, it's baffling how badly they fucked it up.

You can like more than one game belonging to the same genre.

TMNT kind of did everything better.

Will Scott Pilgrim ever come to Steam or is it forever free courtesy of EGS?

works on my machine

Attached: 66PqzTk0tjcgENIy.webm (1280x720, 1.85M)

Shit Pillgrin is shit

Answer the goddamn question.

TMNT kind of was more shallow than I was expecting, and 6 player coop was a bad idea.

Haven't played TMNT but I didn't care for River City Girls. Probably good if you're into oldschool beat em ups, but I kind of like the nu-beat em up trend that isn't 60% of your playtime spent on your ass.

River City Girls combat was pretty stiff compared to its contemporaries

same, i like them both, still, river city underground did it better than river city girls.

The Takeover and FightnRage are the only other good beat em ups on the market with SOR4.

I don't care for TMNT and River City Girls looks pozzed and floaty

bottom; just because it has online co-op

>TFW want another final fight but capcom would 100% fuck it up
>Again.