Right good

>right good
>left bad

Why? clearly right would die on the battlefield because she has zero protection.

Attached: 1613871915518.jpg (1786x1480, 438.19K)

Sexy = good.

Right makes me horny
Don't care about accuracy

It's magic, I don't have to explain tits.

clearly right is a better fighter then some troon larping in roman gear, the chad on the right doesn't even need your faggy roman gear

Attached: 1589258569765.png (1024x1280, 959.54K)

Neither of them are good.

she would get raped and beheaded just because she looks like some slut meanwhile left would kill many people.

if we're being honest then left would die on the battlefield too because it's a woman and women have a fraction of the upper body strength or explosive muscle power or bone density that men have
Since both are fantasy I prefer the right because it's nice to look at. I don't mind the armor on the left either but it's just a non attractive person and I prefer to look at attractive people of both genders

In a realistic scenario both would die quickly since they are women, unless of course, they are fighting other women.
Fiction doesnt need to be realistic or make sense.

you're not that guy

I demand equality on both sides

Attached: 1642127445861.png (1344x1056, 241.64K)

left would die in her party city getup too

The left would also die on a battlefield. The fact that she has some parts covered makes little difference, because enemies will always attack at the large exposed spots.

Both would die on the battlefield because women in combat is the most retarded meme ever conceived. At least the one on the right serves her natural biological function of getting my dick hard.

because its a videogame you retarded realism retard

What gaem?

#WengerOut

Attached: boob_armor.png (931x651, 159.64K)

And left would survive a realistic battlefield?
Lol no

If you're going for a fantasy setting you might as well make it an enjoyable fantasy

they would both die on the battlefield because they are women (allegedly)

>switch outfits
>right still good
>left puke inducing
???
whoah

>everyone's got bolt-ons
Fucking disgusting.

/thread

>right good
Yes

Why can't we have some middle-ground?

the Spitfire is a work of art

I don't care about the armor, I care about the stronk women = ugly man
Why can't she be athletic and hot?
I wouldn't play the game cause it's shit but still

Attached: 1551308421015.jpg (2250x3000, 549.75K)

Both are trash
This is better

Attached: 1555618296538.jpg (4132x3328, 3.51M)

IDEAL

Attached: ddds.jpg (1786x1480, 802.33K)

Wish granted, let's give the armor on the right to the woman on the left

Attached: monkey paw.jpg (499x380, 20.65K)

>both have femoral arteries exposed and would die quickly and horribly
>right is sexy and left is man-faced

Yeah, I'm sticking with the right

Both would die
At least the right makes my peepee hard

>muh realism

Right one is weaker than the average soldier, but that attire heavily reduces male attackers' precision.
Left one is still weaker than the average soldier, and that's that.

Sorry user, female character design nowadays is made solely for people who beat their meat 24/7 or beat who cut off their meat. Normal people will sort of just have to accept that for the time being.

Attached: 4455.png (756x643, 244.89K)

2bh female fighters wouldn't look like pretty top models.

Attached: image-9-2.jpg (650x315, 29.28K)

>niggers don't even know about based mid '90s arcade shmups

>"realistic" female "warrior" designs
The most cringe choice, easily.

Right can distract enemies with her slutty body meanwhile left is just a powerless hag what kill get killed immediately

Both would die on the battlefield because they're (allegedly) women

girl on the right is from motto haramase right

Aren't those two different classes though? or am I supposed to believe left is the west's idea of a succubus?

Because it's not about realism.
If you want realism, why the fuck are you playing video games based on being a near immortal hero in a fantasy world, killing demons?

It's about design and what appeals to who. The kind of people who play ARPG Loot Simulators aren't the kind of people to look at some ugly old granny that could very well be a man, and not the silly funny kind like in anime, pic related, but the very clearly agenda driven one. They're the kind of people who love seeing hot chicks and blowing up monsters in fun ways. They don't want to hear about what bullshit you WANT them to believe.

Attached: 1624497803784.png (889x797, 687.81K)

Going to war naked was a thing people did all the way until the romans
Your argument is invalid

Probably because real life amazons went into the battlefield dressed more like the right than left. Heck, knowing that the ancient greeks often fought entirely in the buff, even right would be considered heavily armored by comparison.

Attached: 89b.jpg (680x422, 59.61K)

yeah those are some nice designs
some of them are a bit overdesigned with too many layers of stuff and too many belts but they're still good overall

I thought accuracy mattered since Any Forums got so upset about historical inaccuracy in the new battlefield games

>do you think thou armor will protect you
Based esl

>clearly right would die on the battlefield because she has zero protection
its not like left is any better off. neck exposed, as well as toes, hands thighs and upper arms. if your gonna half ass your armor, might as well just go skimpy. hell right is unironically better off, at least she has hand protection

Attached: 1581369901773.png (229x252, 25.58K)

there's nothing about fighting that makes you ugly, unless you get hit in the face too hard
it's just that in real life only ugly women would choose that kind of hobby/career

Both would be raped and beheaded because they're women on the battlefield.
That's why this dumbass "game if it real" shit is always boring as fuck.

Attached: 1643250832010.jpg (450x489, 197.74K)

ahem

Attached: 1563283911248.webm (1280x720, 2.86M)

Context matters
Any Forums is not one person

What is the name of this weapon?

Attached: 1642070005136.jpg (4132x3328, 2.71M)

naginata

...

Which historic setting are those two characters in the OP from?

Right won't die on the battlefield. She'll be captured and turned into a cumdump for the enemy.

>bro, just slam in as many belts and buckles as you can fit
garbage design. 0 original thoughts

You are bait
All future replies are faggots

both get shit done but only one is pleasant to watch. I don't see the issue.

these women are all a lot more pretty than whats in the OP and none of them were selected for having pretty faces in particular

Are we really still having this argument after how many decades?

Attached: emma.jpg (635x475, 163.78K)

This, cannot believe it took this long to get the right answer

While Blizzard did uglify Amazon's face, for once it fits with the shithole world and gloomy atmosphere. Agree with everything else, though.

>based milk factory

Attached: sub02.png (1000x456, 677.5K)

I would have neither but right is better
Women are cringe if you're gonna put them at least make them good to look at

Realism is bad.

Attached: 1502204893132.jpg (1000x1315, 819.9K)

i kneel....

Female fighters aren't realistic in the first place

>right would die on the battlefield because she has zero protection
Protip: neither of them are going to any battlefield. Roll that over in your head for a while.

Attached: 1637696587066.jpg (600x600, 180.15K)

My current favorite weapon, the naginata.

Attached: no_more_heroes_desperate_struggle-1086961.jpg (1280x719, 190.88K)

Whole lot of projection in that pic.

Because right is quite literally a porn game only meant for fapping material so it serves her purpose

If accuracy mattered women would not be warriors

for 95% of history people were not wearing full armor. It was impractical to move in, and most importantly extremely expensive. A full set of armor, especially with a lot of metal pieces were like the tanks of the time, though it was more like if only rich and the royal got to fight in the tanks

Attached: file.png (507x699, 612.82K)

I give zero fucks

Games aren't reality though. I work in heavy industry and since "equality" has come into existence we've been forced to diversity hire "strong" women who apply. they typically look like haggard shit and are about 50% stronger than regular women. They still ask for help every five minutes because 50% isn't saying a lot. I don't want to look at busted faced cunts all day, then run a game and look at more busted-faced cunts. Games are supposed to be escapism.

>h "game"
>it's just you walking around grinding and collecting still images
>the art is fucking garbage that looks like it was drawn by a blind dude
Seriously what is the point?

Attached: 1645517587304.png (678x908, 803.58K)

>Any Forums is one person
I didn't care about the crippled bitch in Battlefield. The game was just buggy as fuck and had a lame campaign.

Really hit home, eh redditor?

>game is so easy that a vanilla playthrough takes no effort at all
>you have to go out of your way and lose to "train" Emma into becoming a cumslut
the worst kind of NTR game

historical female warriors also wouldn't be on steroids

I think the sword looks stupid

Attached: 1613816513479.png (467x257, 75.12K)

Attached: 1.png (568x319, 282.14K)

The left one is based on Mediterranean real history, besides a couple of things like the shoulderpad, and the headband its pretty accurate

Can you give me the definition of the word "projection" please?

What makes a good H-game anyway?

yea because diablo is a realistic or based on historical events
hows your sorcesses training retard?

No gameplay. Should just be a VN that's basically a sex story with some visual aides
Fuck all the retards who want to stop fapping to play some minigames

There were no historical female warriors, you dumb knob
>inb4 some vice article
Yeah and scotland was built by niggers too according to their historical society

I agree. I'm saying accuracy doesn't matter, its just a game

/fred