Make an AI generated MTG card using the name of a video game. Post results

Attached: 275f8ad5-e32b-4ad3-abc4-1bf3b18ef1d8.png (660x1000, 964.39K)

Attached: 843305bb-bc77-460c-8616-47aab52454c6.png (660x1000, 879.8K)

Attached: OP.png (660x1000, 846.54K)

Okay, so the AI changes your card to a fish if you use any sensitive language or persons, but you can save it quickly before that happens.

Attached: Dino Autist.jpg (704x512, 91.3K)

Attached: cc050ed5-f2e0-4096-936f-0e9cb5e9ffa1.png (660x1000, 1.06M)

Attached: 54235eec-1c56-42db-8eb5-df5a718c0355.png (660x1000, 885.8K)

Attached: 6c1f21cb-d534-4288-a232-5b51a68a5045.png (660x1000, 785.78K)

Attached: 1629109686571.png (660x1000, 850.28K)

Attached: 876d3f02-489e-4596-9c88-16aceb9e4e97.png (660x1000, 783.24K)

Attached: download (1).png (660x1000, 861.33K)

Attached: rosewater the wicked, mtg.jpg (704x512, 112.21K)

Attached: lobcorp.png (660x1000, 926.58K)

Isn't this the same cost/effect as an existing card or was that one only 1R

Attached: 892d0b3e-d8a0-449c-9f4d-e3c8b1dfe043.png (660x1000, 870.88K)

You can run the same name to get different results.

You have to wait for the picture to generate fully

I like these.

Attached: de600f09-b330-45b3-b637-c1ef63e5165e.png (660x1000, 823.32K)

This legitimately looks like it could be a Innistrad card. I'm pretty impressed with this AI.

Attached: 2d16b852-2ab2-4fd8-81e7-64bfc9c33bdd.png (660x1000, 1023.77K)

Attached: index.png (660x1000, 925.35K)

Attached: orc.png (343x506, 349.86K)

Attached: e05faa92-b3a5-488f-bfe0-148a472fe3be.png (660x1000, 880.7K)

Saved it before jewed.

Attached: oppai mtg.jpg (304x224, 22.06K)

Attached: 997b8178-0181-4293-b51d-94bbce9389df.png (660x1000, 930.24K)

When did magic get bad bad ?

Attached: 1624311748670.png (660x1000, 879.99K)

Give this card an enchantment that makes it unlockable and that would get annoying.

I got one with Suspend!

Attached: 972A5AD8-3874-4075-B5A7-445C98E621CB.png (660x1000, 937.36K)

Attached: b511729e-818d-4be8-a2d0-b0c71b5debcc.png (660x1000, 1.08M)

>Common

I don't think so

It's a pretty mediocre card but it is functional and kind of makes sense name-wise

Attached: file.png (660x1000, 824.2K)

Yeah I'd believe this. These cards are better designed than any set in teh past 5 years

Attached: file.png (345x517, 337.87K)

I love this art

Attached: 1624240526010.png (660x1000, 898.73K)

This card's second effect makes no sense.

Based

Attached: 0f3a0787-d0a8-4d32-911d-2a4ca62dfca7.png (660x1000, 890.99K)

I wouldn't put it in a standard deck.

Attached: 8596d2b1-601c-4b27-ba5f-0fe5a9117b49.png (660x1000, 792.49K)

it's literally the effect of at least 3 magic cards, both sacrifice a creature, then your target sacrifice another

Ravnica was terrible. Everyone in my group kept playing Innastrad then stopped around that time.

Attached: geraltMAgic.png (660x1000, 787.04K)

This somehow makes sense?

Attached: file.png (660x1000, 693.38K)

Attached: 1637528807333.png (660x1000, 808.17K)

The way it's worded doesn't make sense. It specifies "each player" then "that player" but there is no target player.

It's okay

Attached: 161d3f5a-6ce9-47d7-bd81-6cc3d35de8c6.png (660x1000, 845.1K)

Attached: 32434.png (660x1000, 975.89K)

MTG gets bad roughly two to four years after you start playing.
When that is is different for everyone, but it tends to take about that long for design philosophy to change enough that the game no longer resembles what got you interested in it.

Test

Utterly busted

Attached: file.png (346x517, 345.01K)

Attached: b8334364-5325-48af-a229-bffb1e492535.png (660x1000, 1.01M)

each player who sacrifices a creature sacrifices another. but yeah, the wording is retarded, unsurprisingly.

Lame

Attached: file.png (578x894, 975.59K)

when the reserved list was created

Attached: 7e0fd1f0-2d85-4708-ac51-e6770587bf51.png (660x1000, 898.43K)

Is this supposed to happen?

Attached: 9FE28C8D-8B49-41F6-B993-3B48CF088875.png (660x1000, 876.21K)