Noooo, you can't remake 9 year old game, it's not old enough

>Noooo, you can't remake 9 year old game, it's not old enough

Meanwhile in early 00s they remade 6 year old Resident Evil and MGS and nobody complained

Attached: vbbb.jpg (1280x720, 99.17K)

I'm just glad it's coming to PC

such a fucking downgrade on the right, lmao

>they remade 6 year old Resident Evil and MGS and nobody complained
because it was for a console no one gave a fuck about back then

There was a bigger leap from PS1 to gamecube than there is from PS3 to PS5

It's not about the number of years. There were far greater advancements in graphical fidelity at that time.

>Resident Evil remake an objectively superior game
>MGS Twin Sna- yeah okay, fair enough...
>TLOU (((part 1))) somehow looks worse, will likely be kiked in some way

You're right OP, gaming really has stagnated compared to back then.

In the early 00s graphics were still making leaps, and even then it was fucking pushing it. Now, graphics have been stagnant for the past fucking decade, basically.

the "remake" looks like an adult's face put on a kid

disingenuous faggot OP, despite the 6 year difference an upgrade from PS1 -> Gamecube was vast in both graphics and audio quality.
In most images, the LoU1 remake looks worse than the remaster and marginally better in a sparse others. This is definition of a "pointless remake" onl good for people who didnt play the originals and somehow ended up with a PS5

Pretty sure everybody complained about Twin Snakes.

>Meanwhile in early 00s they remade 6 year old Resident Evil and MGS and nobody complained
1996 Resident Evil
1998 Resident Evil 2
1999 Resident Evil 3: Nemesis
2000 Resident Evil Survivor
2000 Resident Evil – Code: Veronica
2001 Resident Evil Survivor 2 – Code: Veronica
2001 Resident Evil Gaiden
2002 Resident Evil (remake)
>meanwhile
2013 TLOU
2014 TLOU remaster
2020 TLOU 2

do you eat shit?

>>Noooo, you can't remake 9 year old game, it's not old enough
it was a different time. RE remake was actually a step up in appearance from the original. Same with twin snakes. Remaking the Last of Us is like releasing yet another X-Men or Spiderman film that just got remade of a remake in a span of 7 years. You're a faggot for liking this shit anyway.

There's only so much you can push graphics until they look exactly like real life. Obviously there's gonna be stagnation at some point.

>NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST ADD MORE THINGS TO THE SCENES AS TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES BECAUSE .... ITS LE BAD!

Attached: 5e3efae7e756e979bb1cb6bfd9e46540.jpg (1914x1071, 1.42M)

>it's not old enough
that's not even the problem you blind nigger: THE GAMES LOOK THE FUCKING SAME. look at Dead space remake, there's like 2 generations of graphics between them. this is clearly a PS4 engine passed as a native PS5 game. nuSony fans are absolute clowns.

Like graphics is the only thing that matters. Talk about clown.

What the fuck are you going to improve about the gameplay? Gameplay standards ALSO used to be going through leaps and have now stagnated. It's the reason ten years of GTA has become ten years of GTAV Online: The standards for what makes a game that sells well have not fucking changed. All Rockstar has to do to make money is keep porting it.

its the same sony formula. throw the thing > distract the guy > choke out the guy > hit the event trigger > move on to next section for cut scene > repeat

If you played the sequel you know they can improve it a lot, the ai and the combat. I expect larger more open areas, new weapons and shit

>Meanwhile in early 00s they remade 6 year old Resident Evil and MGS and nobody complained
They also went to systems that didn't have them and weren't backwards compatible while tlou 1 is getting remade for the ps5 which is backwards compatible with the ps4.

It's almost like it wasn't only age that was a factor back then

They are not going to update environments or functional code in the slightest. They're going to replace major models, make graphics enhancements, maybe alter textures, and call it a day.

>Talk about clown.
stfu you clown nigger an make a real point. the Frost engine used for Dead Space is light years ahead of the original. The original 1996 RE was an early PSone game and completely outdated. Not to mention half a dozen RE games were released between. What the fuck is ND's excuse? What's the "gameplay" changes they can make if the game is a 1 by 1 remaster? The remaster already plays at 60fps. How much of a cock sucker do you have to be to shill for this?

Did you play the game already?

>Meanwhile in early 00s they remade 6 year old Resident Evil and MGS and nobody complained

That's a shitty excuse because they were remade for a different console.

TLOU is gay

I don't think they said 1 for 1 remaster, they said rebuilt from the ground up

>it
is not the same game.

>I don't think they said 1 for 1 remaster
they did.