What are some remasters worse than the original?
What are some remasters worse than the original?
Oliver Nelson
David Powell
All of them.
Gavin Hernandez
/threadr
Gavin Hernandez
What is this webm trying to convey exactly
Jack Parker
I'm guessing animations of the main character were more expressive, and then in all future re-releases the character was far more stiff.
Jose Williams
yeah, ps2 could do character animation but ps4 could not. same thing with particles, ps2 could do them but ps4 could not.
Leo Sullivan
The re-release looks far more realistic, but less cinematic. Sounds like a failure in art design, not technology.
Robert Sullivan
>more realistic
Realism is good in simulators, it can fuck off in anything else.
Jacob Cooper
>not technology.
It is, the PS4 literally could not do as many particle effects as the PS2. The PS2 has an insanely huge pixel pipeline (2560-bit) which allows it to throw transparencies at the screen without breaking a sweat. The biggest choke point for all modern gpus when it comes to raster performance is transparencies, it tanks even the latest RTX cards. That's the advantage of custom silicon.
Jacob Russell
Character doesn't stumble when colossi do they're stomp attacks.
Logan Lewis
Matthew Ortiz
The worst remasters are the ones which sometimes look very good, but sometimes terrible.
James Harris
James Rogers
The only one I can think of that DOESN'T look worse than the original would probably be Nier.
Mason Smith
Modern Warfare looks best.
William Gutierrez
I love that remake but it does kinda look worse. Graphically it's much better but art wise it's lacking in some areas.
Joshua Perez
fpbp
/thread
Gabriel Morales
Nintendo ones usually.
Logan Thomas
Remake lots far better.
Ian Miller
Samuel Lee
Justin Young
wow how dignified and high brow truly the distinguishing feature of a good and bad game!