Give it to me straight Any Forums what are the odds of it being good? i'm fucking dying for a new isometric arpg

give it to me straight Any Forums what are the odds of it being good? i'm fucking dying for a new isometric arpg

Attached: diablo4.png (1920x1080, 1.55M)

0%, it's Nu-Blizzard

It will be fine
D2 was a shit game that aged like ass, so hopefully all the D2 boomers have died by now

what are the chances of it ever coming out this decade? theyre probably busy sanitizing it with wokeness right now from the ground up

It's going to be gnarly sick.

Still around, waiting for ladder to start at the end of the month.

they didn't show much and things they showed will change so therefore we know shit about this game. Also I think it was just move to not lose face competently because they haven't presented new games for ages now.

I am calling it now that it will actually be quite good.
They have had years to make something decent, and Any Forums is gonna eat it up upon release despite shitting on it beforehand.

It will be better than D3.

>blizzard
nil

>It will be better than D3.
so you've set the lowest bar imaginable? why not say torchlight 3 for an even lower bar?

0%, nuBlizzard can't make games and this won't change with the Microsoft acquisition

D3 easily has the best moment to moment gameplay in the genre but you would have to actually play video games to know that

...

That is such a bad opinion

>torchlight 3 for an even lower bar
so is d3 the lowest imaginable or not

Have you even read any news from blizzard over the last few years? Im guessing not

Imagination should be flexible

hello, my dad works for blizzard and he told me it's going to be pretty good. i believe him

Attached: 3d717611abfce966a60f643ae069413f.jpg (386x191, 19.6K)

awesome, can't wait

Depends on what you mean by "good". I think there's a good chance that combat will feel at least as good as D3 (which is already the best in genre), the atmosphere also seems to be an upgrade (meaning a major downgrade to D2, but on-par or better than most other ARPGs), and while this area is subject to the most potential change, it looks like systems are going to be less bad than D3.

And D3 by itself, while suffering from crippling flaws (insulting campaign, ridiculous systems like 100000% damage bonuses tied to sets, extreme lack of longevity, the affront that was RMAH at launch, etc), is still worth playing for a bit in each season. Enjoying the good combat until you quickly reach the point where there's literally nothing else to do but grind for more levels-after-levels and marginally better rolled versions of your BiS legendaries, that sort of thing. Is a game that's (perhaps quite substantially) better than a game that's already worth playing "good", even if it had some decisive flaw or another? I don't know or care, but if D4 turns out to be worth playing as I suspect, then it is "a game that is worth playing", at least if you are a spineless faggot that is willing to support neo-Blizzard after they've ran all of their franchises to the fucking ground.

I couldn't go back to D2 after playing D3 post necro expansion.

If D4 is more D3, I'm happy.

Attached: 1647138914939.jpg (680x667, 60.84K)

I don't know about the gameplay, but knowing its made by Blizzard means there is 0% chance it wont be cluttered with battle-passes, shop items, cosmetics and other gameplay irrelevant jank.

>type A
>type B

Diablo 3 is fun