Bloodborne > Sekiro > DS2 > > DS1 > DeS > > ER > DS3
Bloodborne > Sekiro > DS2 > > DS1 > DeS > > ER > DS3
sekiro>bloodborne>ER>ds1>des>ds2>ds3
ftfy
ER is mediocre trash and belongs all the way at the bottom with the dogshit that was ds3.
>ER is mediocre trash and belongs all the way at the bottom with the dogshit that was ds3.
ER>Sekiro>DS3>BB>DS1>DS2>DeS
BB>ER>Sekiro>DS3>DS1>DS2
simple as
here's the official ranking
playing it for the first time
bloodborne>sekiro>elden ring>dark souls >demon souls>ds3>ds2
playing it multiple times
>bloodborne>elden ring>dark souls>ds2>ds3>demon souls>sekiro
You have no reason to put ER below Dark Souls 2
It's the same garbage made by literally the same B team, it's everything you wanted. More trash.
>but it's bad!!
Congratulations on finally feeling what 99% of normal human beings felt like when playing Dark Souls 2 for the first time lmao
Sekiro isn't a Souls game and shouldn't compared as such.
Bloodborne > DeS > DaS > DaS3 > DaS2 > ER
DS2 is more interesting compared to ER even if very extremely flawed. Er is just ds3 but open world.
Sekiro > DS1 > DeS > DS3 >> ER > DS2 > BB (I am not buying a PS4 for one game)
BB > DS1 > Sekiro
power gap
DeS > ER > DS3
power gap
DS2
>DS3 >> ER
It's literally the same encounter design down to gank squads and pointless frustrating enemies in random locations. Elden Ring reeks of Tanimura.
Only thing Dark Souls 2 have is the Dark Souls name so you jerkoff to it, had it been a completely different IP, like it was originally supposed to, you'd hate it. Just like you hate Elden Ring.
Tell me one thing that ER does better than DS3, aside from the open world meme.
Main bosses
Legacy dungeons
DS3>ER>DS2>DS1>BB
Didnt play sekiro or DeS
ER is simply a mediocre game, you annoying shill.
Level design
Boss encounters
Weapon variety
Build variety
NPCs
Lore
Amount of content
Combat mechanics
Artstyle
Soundtrack
Not him, but I have plenty of reasons to consider ER worse than DaS2.
>frame-perfect input-reading
>animation cancels
>mid and late game mini boss double and triple battles
>DaS3's lock-on system
>DaS2-levels of enemy tracking
>Enemies placed at the side of every other doorway
>After four games, pure Faith is still fucking shit compared to everything else
>ER Main bosses better than DS3, when the final boss is nothing but a shoehorned enemy that gets slapped with no prior relevance to the story
>Legacy dungeons are nothing but a straight corridor with a copypasted boss at the end
Do you get paid for this or are you legitimately shilling the game for free ?
>ds2 and DeS anywhere but at the bottom
opinion discarded
Learn how to properly read text you troglodite, I'm exactly saying how its mediocre and why its mediocre, because its Dark Souls 2: 2.
But then again, don't expect any DaS2 fan to be intelligent, don't worry, in 5 years you'll jerk off to ER and pass off its numerous flaws as qualities.
DS1 > Sekiro > BB > Everything else.
>all negative points are ways (you) cannot cope with game difficulty
Just admit you suck and stop playing
>>Legacy dungeons are nothing but a straight corridor with a copypasted boss at the end
legacy dungeon means the main areas like stormveil, raya lucaria, leyndell you retarded nigger
I did read your garbage post, unfortunately. DS2 is solid, unlike the mediocre ER and not comparable in the slightest. Don't reply to me ever again.
Even though you're legally allowed to be retarded, you don't have to resign yourself to that
I've already beaten the game solo with the greatsword. Adaptation is no excuse for bad game design. Seethe more.
>no argument
12 you don't even deserve a (You) anymore, you're probably non-white as well.
>finish Sekiro
>it's fucking amazing
>think this is the future of fromsoft games
>they go back to dark souls
JUST
>I already beat the game on easy mode
My guy we've been over this a million times, putting good games on top and the sneaking Ds2 in the second place or whatever just to pretend it ain't the worst piece of shit game ever made ain't gonna fool anyone.
Sekiro > Bloodborne > DS1 > DeS > poop > DS2 = ER = DS3
>Level Design
No
>Boss encounters
You have to be insane to believe this
>Weapon variety
Sure
>Build Variety
Sure
>NPCs
They're just as bad. There's just more of them
>Lore
Debatable
>Amount of content
Technically yes but its quantity vs quality
>Combat mechanics
Technically yes
>Artstyle
Debatable but I agree
>Soundtrack
Hell no, I can barely remember a single ER song, DS3 had the best by a mile
He didn't play the game
Stormveil literally mogs anything in DS3
This is an undeniable fact
Sekiro > ER> BB > DS1 > DS3 > Getting hit with a car > DS2
Absolutely correct
ER>BB>DS2>DeS>DS1>DS3
Quit putting Sekiro in there, it's an amazing game, but it's not a Souls game
Sekiro > DS1 ~ ER > DeS > > > DS2 = DS3
Didn't played BB
Post KMS run.
The gank encounters/annoying enemy types were overall at an all time worst in BB honestly. Some of DS2's areas like the challenge DLC routes exceed it, but BB had shit like bell maidens, brainsuckers, winter lanterns, spiders, maggot worms, shark giants, research hall patients, the celestial emissary/rom/micolash/one reborn fights, snake-bundles, gardens-of-eyes, hooded afflicted beastfolk, cainhurst fleas, ghosts, gank trio npc hunters, merciless watchers, shadows etc.
Usually in way more enclosed environments than ER, and you weren't afforded the ability to bypass obstacles with the jump button.
Sure you had a slightly faster dodge and rallying, but that hardly made a difference when there were 3-4 flailing enemies rushing you with attacks that swiped 40% of your health away.
When people compare ER to DS2, I feel like they're wilfully ignoring half the shit the other games do that makes them more comparable.
Elden Ring > Dark Souls > Demon's Souls > Bloodborne > Sekiro > DS2 > blood tinged excrement > DS3
ER>Bloodborne=Sekiro>DS1>DeS=DS2>DS3>>>Most other video games
Not putting sekiro in there is just a soulstard cope because there's no way to not put it in first place
Why don't we add Ninja Gaiden and DMC while we're at it?