Hogwarts Legacy Houses

Now that the dust has settled, what house is the Sorting Hat going to place you in?

Attached: sorting_hat.jpg (959x719, 87.16K)

Gryffindor. I wanted to be Slytherin but then I saw the super cute gay Slytherin guy so i want to play a Gryffindor jock that fucks him RAW. Also Gryffindor are the most "protagonist" tier class and it triggers me if I have to play as a Gryffindor in every single other harry potter game but this one.

Attached: Sebastian says GAY RIGHTS.jpg (379x417, 24.85K)

Slytherin. Going to slip my wand into all the uptight Ravenclaw girls, goody-too-shoes Gryffindor bitches, and those Hufflepuff sluts. Then back to my dungeon every night to abuse my kinky, Slytherin nymphos who call me master.

I can’t wait to walk into Gringotts and just avada kedava every goblin I see

How can one "man" be so cringe?
How can one man be so based?

In slytherin with the rest of my fellow pureblood chads

Attached: HighlevelLeftAmericantoad-mobile(2).webm (640x360, 1.75M)

Farquaad spic got out of the containment zone again huh

will there be any mechanical differences between houses

Gonna not be a fag and go in blind because I'm genuinely curious what I'll get instead of having the experience predetermined.

I would like the Sorting Hat to place me in a Chinese escalator if only to spare me from another second in this reality with one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1591157063636.jpg (1616x2864, 1.27M)