'x' game is a glorified tech demo

>'x' game is a glorified tech demo

Attached: vidya.png (2100x938, 60.23K)

>it's a good game but not a good 'x' game

>I’m cautiously optimistic about the release of ‘x’

There’s literally nothing wrong with that sentence though.

If I were to make a Fallout racing game that was really fun to play, it would still be a crap Fallout game because it’s not fucking Fallout.

>umm actually pokemon isn't made by nintendo

Any sentence that uses the phrase "Gameplay Loop"

>'x' had a rough transition into 3D.

You're not smart, sorry to break it to you

>I'm not paying $'x' for a video game

dysonance ludonarrative.

>this game has bad hitboxes

Never said I was, friendo.

Attached: 6B243E5A-E3FA-4DED-8DC5-B2C566EA76B5.jpg (2705x2658, 736.71K)

You're right. It should be "I'm not paying ANY money for a video game".

how is this "trying to sound smart"? it's just a respectful way of saying early 3D fucking sucked.

Let me guess, you're a VaIvedrone?

>Actually you're not supposed to like this team/character, their presence is satire because their ideology is actually baaad.

>ITT: Brainlets too dumb to discuss video games beyond surface levels

Attached: never forget.png (712x400, 7.08K)

>Of course completing the game 100% is boring. You're not SUPPOSED to do everything.

Did this become a thing around the time of Pokémon BDSP? It feels like it did

Do you have a better alternative for describing a cycle of gameplay? Or do you just hate it when people talk about a game's patterns?

>style over substance